Skip to main content
  • Other Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
Advertisement
JCORE Reference
this is the JCORE Reference site slogan
  • Home
  • Most Read
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Patients
  • Reference Site Links
    • View Regions
  • Archive

Medial Longitudinal Arch Development of Children Aged 7 to 9 Years: Longitudinal Investigation

Jasper W.K. Tong, Pui W. Kong
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20150192 Published 1 August 2016
Jasper W.K. Tong
J.W.K. Tong, PhD, Allied Health Specialties, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore and Physical Education and Sports Science Academic Group, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pui W. Kong
P.W. Kong, PhD, Physical Education and Sports Science Academic Group, Nanyang Technological University, 1 Nanyang Walk National Institute of Education, Singapore 637616.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background It is unclear at what age the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) of the foot becomes stable in children. The influence of footwear on MLA development also is unknown.

Objective The purpose of this study was to examine the MLA development of children using a longitudinal approach. The relationship between wearing different types of footwear and MLA development also was explored longitudinally.

Design This was a longitudinal cohort observational study.

Methods The MLA of 111 healthy children (mean age=6.9 years, SD=0.3) was evaluated using 3 parameters (arch index [AI], midfoot peak pressure [PP], and maximum force [MF]) extracted from dynamic foot loading measurements at baseline (t0), 10-month follow-up (t1), and 22-month follow-up (t2). Information on footwear usage was surveyed. Linear mixed modeling was used to test for differences in MLA over time.

Results The MLA of the children remained stable over time (AI: t0/t1/t2=0.25 [95% confidence interval (CI)=0.24, 0.26]/0.25 [95% CI=0.24, 0.26]/0.25 [95% CI=0.24, 0.26]; P=.95). When the children's sex was considered, the AI of boys decreased (higher arch) with age (0.26 [95% CI=0.24, 0.27]/0.25 [95% CI=0.24, 0.27]/0.25 [95% CI=0.23, 0.27]; P=.02). Boys also displayed a flatter MLA than girls at age 6.9 years (AI: mean difference=0.02 [95% CI=0.01, 0.04]; P=.02). At baseline, children who wore closed-toe shoes displayed the lowest MLA overall (AI: closed-toe shoes/sandals/slippers=0.26 [95% CI=0.24, 0.28]/0.24 [95% CI=0.23, 0.25]/0.25 [95% CI=0.24, 0.26]; P<.01). Children who used slippers at toddlers' age experienced a higher PP (flatter arch) in later childhood than those who wore sandals (mean difference=31.60 kPa [95% CI=1.44, 61.75]; post hoc P=.04).

Limitations Information on the type of footwear worn was self-reported and, therefore, may be subjected to recall bias.

Conclusions The MLA of children remained stable from 7 to 9 years of age. The child's sex and the type of footwear worn during childhood may influence MLA development.

Flexible flatfoot may affect musculoskeletal performance and the risk of injury in children.1,2 Consequently, some clinicians recommend treatment before the age of 6 years,3,4 whereas others discourage any intervention for asymptomatic flatfoot, as this condition may resolve on its own as the children grow.5–11 However, a recent review suggested that the chances of this condition resolving naturally after the age of 10 years remains slim.12 In general, a decreasing trend of flatfoot that corresponded with increasing age has been reported.13–16 This observation might explain that the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) of the foot is actively developing alongside the child's growth.14

The MLA is thought to develop most rapidly until the age of 6 years,8,17,18 after which changes are less apparent.7,19 There is, however, much debate on MLA development during the critical age range of 7 to 9 years. Within this age range, some studies demonstrated that the MLA remained fairly stable,19–22 whereas other studies showed that the foot arch was becoming higher.23 The foot arch also was reported to become flatter from 7 to 8 years of age and to show a reversal to a higher arch from 8 to 9 years of age.15,16 Therefore, it is still uncertain at which point the MLA stops developing in children. In addition, it is currently unknown whether MLA development differs between boys and girls, although cross-sectional studies suggested that boys tend to have a flatter foot type than girls.11,13–16,24,25 There is a need to clarify the conflicting reports on MLA development in boys and girls during the critical age range from 7 to 9 years using a longitudinal approach.26 Subsequently, health care practitioners can make informed decisions when managing flexible flatfoot in children.

The use of shoes in early childhood also may have an influence on MLA development.27–30 Optimum foot development seems to occur in the barefoot environment,27,28,31 whereas flatfoot has shown to be closely associated with wearing shoes at an earlier age.13,29,32,33 Sachithanandam and Joseph33 proposed that shoe wearing before the age of 6 years would predispose a child to a flatter foot later in life compared with another child who wears shoes only after the age of 6 years. Hence, some researchers have discouraged wearing of shoes in children because they believed that barefoot walking would enhance ligamentous strength, which eventually may help in arch development.2,24 The confirmation of the relationship between footwear and foot arch development from a longitudinal data set will be useful for clinicians to advise parents on the type of footwear most suitable for healthy foot arch development in children.

In short, there is (1) disagreement on whether the MLA is still developing higher or lower or remains stable in children aged 7 to 9 years and (2) a lack of longitudinal data displaying the relationship between footwear usage and MLA development in children. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to clarify whether the MLA was still developing higher or lower or remained stable in children from age 7 to 9 years using a longitudinal study approach. A secondary aim was to confirm the association between footwear usage and MLA development. Our first hypothesis was that there would be no significant changes in the MLA of children from 7 to 9 years of age. This hypothesis was in line with the only other longitudinal study that showed a stable foot arch in children within the same age range.19 Second, we hypothesized that there would be no significant differences in MLA development among children who wore different types of footwear.

Materials and Method

Study Design

A longitudinal study was conducted to examine the MLA of a cohort of primary 1 children (mean age=6.9 years, SD=0.3) at baseline (t0) and followed up at 10 months (t1) and 22 months (t2) using dynamic footprint measurements. We decided to follow this cohort over 22 months because of the discrepancy in the literature on foot arch stabilization from 7 to 9 years of age.15,16,19–23

Participants

Two hundred sixty-nine primary 1 children (equivalent to grade 1 elementary school children in North America), approximately 7 years of age, from a local neighborhood school were invited to enroll in this study through convenience sampling. Parents or legal guardians of 122 children gave written informed consent for their children or wards to participate. Children were excluded if they had a history of foot surgery; conditions that affected the nerves, muscles, foot, and leg postures; or pain or injury that required non-weight bearing greater than 1 month at the time of the study.20,24 Nine children met the exclusion criteria, and 2 children were unable to follow the MLA evaluation protocol. These 11 children were subsequently excluded from the study. In total, 111 participants were enrolled at baseline and followed up at 10 and 22 months (Tab. 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Demographics of the Children at Each Time Point Over the Study Perioda

Background Survey

At baseline, survey questions were developed to collect information on the exclusion criteria (eAppendix). Information on footwear usage, such as type and frequency of footwear worn by the participants, also was collected. Details of the footwear factors are presented below.

Footwear Factors

Four questions that pertained to the age of the children when footwear was first used, type of footwear worn, and frequency of using the footwear were developed:

  1. When did your child or ward first put on footwear?

  2. At the onset of footwear use, what kind of footwear did your child or ward put on most of the time?

  3. At the onset of footwear use, how often did your child or ward put on footwear?

  4. Excluding school hours, what kind of footwear does your child or ward put on most of the time?

Questions 1 through 3 provided information on footwear usage at toddlers' age during which walking was developing. Question 4 referred to the type of footwear worn by the children at baseline (age 7 years). These 4 footwear factors were chosen because previous studies reported that the type29 and frequency33 of footwear worn and age when footwear was first used33 had influences on the foot arch structure. The parents or legal guardians were provided with pictorial examples on the types of footwear worn by most children in Singapore (Fig. 1). These footwear included sandals, slippers, and closed-toe shoes with and without fastenings. Each parent or legal guardian was allowed to select only one choice of footwear each for questions 2 and 4 for their child.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Pictorial examples of footwear typically worn by Singaporean children. (A) Sandals: open-toe footwear with adjustable fastenings (eg, straps, self-adhesive fasteners, or buckles) at the forefoot, midfoot, or heel to hold the foot firmly. (B) Slippers: open-toe footwear without adjustable fastenings, commonly known as thongs, flip-flops, and slip-ons; excludes bedroom slippers meant for nighttime use. (C) Shoes without fastenings: closed-toe footwear without adjustable fastenings but with a heel counter. (D) Shoes with fastenings: closed-toe footwear with adjustable fastenings (eg, laces, straps, self-adhesive fasteners, buckles) at the midfoot to hold the foot firmly and with a heel counter.

From the responses to the survey, footwear factors were categorized into various levels (Tab. 2). In order to ensure an adequate number of children in each footwear subgroup during analysis, those who wore closed-toe shoes with fastenings (n=11) and without fastenings (n=10) at baseline were combined into a single closed-toe shoes subgroup. Children who first put on footwear later than 2 years of age (n=8) were not analyzed for this particular footwear factor due to the small sample size.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

Categorization Levels of Footwear Factors

MLA Arch Assessment

The MLA was assessed from dynamic footprints obtained from a 2-step gait approach using the emed M pressure platform (Novel GmbH, Munich, Germany) at all 3 time points. The pressure platform consisted of 2,792 sensors (4 sensors/cm2) arranged within an area of 395 mm × 240 mm, preset in the factory to record footsteps at a sampling frequency of 50 Hz. It was placed flat on the ground, embedded midway along a raised (2.25-cm) jigsaw-fitted, high-density foam walkway (7.06 m × 0.86 m).34 Data were recorded utilizing proprietary emed/E software (version 23.1.14e). Each child was positioned 0.7 m away from the edge of the platform and, upon instruction by the tester, commenced walking with self-selected speed along the foam walkway, placing the second footstep onto the platform and halting at the fifth step. A total of 3 footprints from each foot were collected, alternating between the left and right feet. This method has shown to be reliable for evaluating footprint geometry and foot loading in children by Tong and Kong.35

Gait speed during the 2-step protocol also was measured using timing gates (TC-System, Brower Timing Systems, Draper, Utah), as this protocol has been shown to affect dynamic footprint loading characteristics.36 The infrared light timing gates were mounted on tripods adjusted to each child's neck height (Fig. 2). The first set of timing gates (start time) was placed across the near edge of the emed platform, and the second set of timing gates (stop time) was placed 1.0 m ahead.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Footprint and midfoot loading measurement protocol with placement of the first set of timing gates at (a) and placement of the second set of timing gates 1 m ahead at (b). Gait speed is computed as 1 m divided by the time taken for the child to walk from the first set of timing gates to the second set of timing gates.

Data Reduction

Subsequently, 3 geometric and loading parameters were extracted from each footprint using emed “Multiprojects-E” software (version 23.1.14e). These parameters included the arch index (AI), midfoot peak pressure (PP), and maximum force normalized to body weight (MF [percentage of body weight]), which characterized the MLA.35 The AI is calculated as the midfoot contact area divided by the total foot excluding the toes, and the PP and MF are defined as the maximum pressure and force (expressed as a percentage of body weight), respectively, experienced on the midfoot. A preliminary scan of the AI acquired from the children showed variations among all 3 footprints on the left and right feet. Step-to-step variability can be expected even when measurements were taken under the same conditions.37 As the footprint data may potentially be skewed when the mean value of the 3 footprints is analyzed, the median AI was used in the analysis instead.38 Similarly, the footprint that corresponded to the median AI was used for the extraction of midfoot PP and MF for each participant.

Data Analysis

Linear mixed modeling was used to examine for changes in the MLA over time with post hoc Bonferroni corrections. This modeling approach is able to correct for missing data that arise from any loss of follow-up at a given time point.39 A first model was built to test for differences between the left and right feet in all 3 parameters over time. The second model included participant's sex as a factor during analysis to observe any differences in MLA development between boys and girls. Thereafter, each footwear factor (Tab. 2) was entered separately into the third model to observe any differences in the 3 outcome parameters among footwear groups. Gait speed was entered as a covariate to adjust for its influence on the 3 MLA parameters in all models. Subgroup analyses were conducted for any parameter that displayed an interaction with time. All analyses were conducted with IBM SPSS software, version 19 (IBM Corp, Armonk, New York), with significance set at P<.05.

Role of the Funding Source

This study was funded by the National Institute of Education Academic Research Fund. The funding source did not play a role in conducting or reporting any aspect of this work.

Results

No significant differences were found in AI (P=.15), midfoot PP (P=.84), or MF (P=.91) between the left and right feet. There is currently no consensus among investigators whether to analyze both feet separately or only one represented foot.40 As symmetrical foot loading has shown to improve with increasing age,41 only the trial that corresponded to the median AI out of the 3 right footprints measured was used for further analysis.

Changes in MLA Over Time

In the total sample, there were no significant changes in AI (P=.95), midfoot PP (P=.61), or MF (P=.79) (eTab. 1). These results suggested that the MLA remained unchanged over time during the study. The results of each MLA parameter also are presented as the 3rd, 50th, and 97th percentiles over the 3 time points separately for boys and girls (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Third, 50th, and 97th percentiles of the arch index and midfoot loading over the 3 time points between boys and girls: (A) arch index for girl, (B) arch index for boys, (C) midfoot peak pressure for girls, (D) midfoot peak pressure for boys, (E) midfoot maximum force for girls, (F) midfoot maximum force for boys. * Significant difference between boys and girls at 6.9 years of age (P<.02). †Main effect of time in boys (P=.02).

Influence of Sex on MLA Development

No overall differences between boys and girls in any MLA parameter were observed. A significant interaction between sex and time was found for AI (P<.01) but not for other MLA parameters. In the subgroup analysis, the AI of boys decreased (higher arch) significantly over time (P=.02), but post hoc comparisons were insignificant (Fig. 3B). This finding implied that the MLA was still developing for boys at age 6.9 years. No significant changes in the AI of girls were noted. Moreover, the AI of boys at t0 (age=6.9 years) was significantly higher (flatter arch) than that of girls (mean difference=0.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.01, 0.04; P=.02; Figs. 3A and 3B). No differences in the AI between male and female participants were found at t1 and t2.

Influence of Footwear Factors on MLA Development

Age of children when they first put on footwear.

There were no significant differences in the MLA parameters (AI: P=.56; PP: P=.73; MF: P=.59) between children who first put on footwear before 1 year of age and those who commenced footwear use at 1 to 2 years of age (AI: mean difference=0.00, 95% CI=−0.02, 0.02; PP: mean difference=−6.83 kPa, 95% CI=−22.08, 8.41; MF: mean difference=1.4%, 95% CI=−3.7, 6.6). No significant interaction between the age of children at the onset of footwear use and time was observed in any MLA parameter.

Type of footwear worn by the children at the onset of using footwear.

Overall, there was a significant difference in midfoot PP among children who wore different footwear at the onset of footwear use (slippers: mean=118.38 kPa, 95% CI=100.00, 136.76; closed-toe shoes with fastenings: mean=99.39 kPa, 95% CI=88.55, 110.23; closed-toe shoes without fastenings: mean=90.17 kPa, 95% CI=74.53, 105.81; sandals: mean=86.78 kPa, 95% CI=74.19, 99.37; P=.02). Post hoc results showed that children who wore slippers frequently at the onset of footwear use experienced higher midfoot loading (more pronated) than those who wore sandals (mean difference=31.60 kPa; 95% CI=1.44, 61.75; post hoc P=.04). No overall differences between footwear subgroups were noted in other MLA parameters. A significant interaction between the type of footwear worn at onset and time was found for AI (P=.02) but not for other MLA parameters. Subgroup analysis showed that the AI of children who used slippers increased (flatter arch) over time (P<.01; eFig. 1), but no post hoc differences between any time point were noted. There were no significant changes in AI for the other footwear subgroups.

Frequency of wearing footwear at the onset of footwear use.

Regardless of the wearing frequency at the onset of footwear use, no significant differences in any MLA parameters were noted overall (eTab. 2). A significant interaction between footwear usage frequency at onset and time was observed in midfoot MF (P=.01) but not in other MLA parameters. Subgroup analysis showed that only the MF of children who used footwear (onset) less than 3 days per week increased (more pronated) significantly over time (P=.01; eFig. 2), but no post hoc differences between time points were noted. No significant changes in the MF were observed in the other footwear (onset) usage frequency subgroups.

Type of footwear worn by the children at baseline.

Participants who frequently wore closed-toe shoes at baseline (age=6.9 years) displayed the highest AI (flattest arch; P<.01) and midfoot loading (PP and MF [more pronated]: P=.04) among all footwear groups (Fig. 4). These results suggested that children who wore closed-toe shoes at 6.9 years of age tended to exhibit a lowered arch than those who wore sandals and slippers. However, post hoc comparisons showed no significant differences in any parameter among the types of footwear. There was no significant interaction between the type of footwear worn at baseline and time in any MLA parameter.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Overall differences in arch index and midfoot loading among children grouped by the footwear worn at baseline. Data are presented as mean difference (95% confidence interval). AI=arch index, MF=maximum force, PP=peak pressure.

Discussion

Our study showed that the MLA in children remained unchanged from 7 to 9 years of age, clarifying the contradictory debates in the literature regarding the age at which the foot arch stabilizes.13–16,19,29 The current study also demonstrated some relationships between footwear usage and foot arch development from a longitudinal data set.

MLA Development

In our study, Singaporean children exhibited a consistent AI at 0.25 and experienced stable midfoot loading from 7 to 9 years of age. These results provide strong evidence that the foot arch structure has already reached a stable state of development during this period. When sex was considered, boys displayed a flatter foot type (higher AI) than girls at 7 years of age, and their arches became slightly less flat (AI decreased) from 7 to 9 years of age. These findings suggest a delay in reaching a stable MLA in boys compared with girls. The later development in boys may explain why many previous cross-sectional studies showed a flatter MLA in boys than girls of the same age.11,13–16,24,25 Taking flexible flatfoot as a developmental process in the first decade of life, one study showed that more than 90% of the treatments on children with flexible flatfoot were unnecessary.24 Findings from our study confirmed that flexible flatfoot is unlikely to develop much further in children from age 7 to 9 years. Such information may guide clinicians to make informed decisions when managing flexible flatfoot in children. For example, when a child is seen with painful flexible flatfoot, the podiatrist or physical therapist may choose to intervene with orthotic therapy knowing that the child's foot arch structure might not develop much further.

Our findings that foot arch structure remained stable from 7 to 9 years of age are in line with other studies reporting a relatively stable trend in the AI of Australian20,21 and German19,22 children (eFig. 3). It must be highlighted, however, that Singaporean children displayed a flatter foot type (higher AI=0.25) than children of European (lower AI=0.19–0.20)19,22 and Australasian (lower AI=0.20–0.21)20,21 descent. These conflicting results in the literature may be attributed to the ethnic influence in MLA development. In previous studies, Brazilian children demonstrated higher dorsal arches than children in the United States and Japan,42 whereas Australian children showed a lower prevalence of flatfoot compared with German children.30 Mauch et al30 postulated that the observed ethnic difference may be associated with footwear, as the Australians preferred barefoot walking or wearing thong-styled and open sandals as a result of a warmer climate. Although Singapore is hot and humid, the children in our study used both open-styled footwear and closed-toe shoes (Tab. 2). These findings suggest that the disparity in AI between Singaporean and European children is likely related to the ethnic difference and not footwear usage between the populations.

Although all MLA parameters remained stable over time in the current study, we must caution that our results are unable to show the MLA development before 7 years of age or after 9 years of age. The only other longitudinal study showed that the foot arch of German children remained fairly stable from 7 to 9 years of age (AI≈0.20).19 Given that the MLA parameters of Singaporean children remained very stable for 22 months, it is unlikely to expect substantial changes in foot arch structure after 9 years of age.

Footwear Factors Associated With MLA Development

Currently, the literature suggests that children do not require shoes until they begin to walk43 or when the environment necessitates shoe wearing (eg, to protect the foot from frostbite in winter).31,44 When shoes are worn, they should be well-fitting, soft, and lightweight and have soft cushions, essentially protecting the feet.28,31,43 Optimum foot development appears to occur in the barefoot environment.27,28,31 However, our findings provide reasoning to re-examine these recommendations in greater detail.

Footwear use for school-aged children.

Our study showed that children who often wore closed-toe shoes at age 7 years displayed a lower MLA than those who wore sandals and slippers. This finding is in line with the notion that children who wore closed-toe shoes exhibited a flatter foot type than those who were habitually barefooted13 or used sandals or slippers29,33 and other forms of footwear.45 Children who walked with closed-toe shoes when they were aged 7 to 10 years13,29,45 consistently displayed a higher proportion of flat feet than those who walked barefoot or with sandals or slippers. Our study agrees with these findings that wearing closed-toe shoes frequently in school-aged children is associated with a flatter foot type. Generally, it is believed that slipper users exercised their intrinsic foot muscles readily by gripping the slippers to prevent them from falling off.29 As a result, the MLA could be strengthened to achieve the truss-like structure. Although such a theory was recently supported by an increase in foot arch height before and after intrinsic foot muscle training on a cohort of adult participants,46 a randomized controlled trial showed no differences in navicular height after similar training.47 Other researchers observed an increased overpronation (flatter foot) and pressure at the medial midfoot after intrinsic muscular fatigue.48,49 Collectively, these studies suggest that intrinsic muscular strength may play a role in influencing foot arch structure.

Footwear use during walking development.

We also examined the association between footwear usage at toddlers' age and MLA development in later childhood. We found that children who often wore slippers at a young age developed a flatter foot type (higher midfoot pressure) than those who used sandals when they reached 7 to 9 years of age. This finding suggests that wearing loosely bound footwear at toddlers' age may lead to a flatter arch in later childhood. In our study, the majority of the children commenced footwear use at 2 years of age or earlier (n=103; Tab. 2), which corresponds well to the age of walking onset for healthy children.31,50 Wearing slippers at a very young age (≤2 years) may have caused intrinsic foot muscle fatigue instead of strengthening the muscles, leading to lower arch development in later childhood. Although both slippers and sandals are open-toe footwear, slippers do not have adjustable fastenings that could secure the foot firmly to the footwear. On the other hand, closed-toe shoes may hold the toddlers' feet too firmly in place. We postulated that toddlers' foot arches require some fastenings to support walking development but not to the extent of the support offered by closed-toe shoes, which may be too restrictive. Therefore, toddlers can benefit from wearing sandals instead of slippers for healthy foot arch development. Closed-toe shoes may be an option, although their influence on foot arch development is unclear.

The finding that wearing loosely bound footwear at toddlers' age may lead to a flatter arch in later childhood appears to contrast with findings of previous studies showing a lower prevalence of flatfoot among children who were habitually unshod13 and those who wore sandals or slippers.29,33 It should be noted, however, that the referenced age at which footwear type data were collected varied substantially among studies. Earlier studies reported the footwear type at the time of study where children were aged 6 to 12 years,45 4 to 13 years,29 and 3 to 12 years.13 Only Sachithanandam and Joseph33 reported the age at which footwear was first used, but the range was wider (1–5 years/6–15 years/16 years and older). Taken together, these findings indicate it is likely that the footwear worn at different ages during childhood may influence MLA development. Further studies may be warranted to investigate the influence of footwear usage on foot arch development at different ages during childhood.

Clinical Recommendations

Clinicians should be informed that footwear might influence MLA development. They may advise parents to discourage toddlers from wearing slippers during the stage of walking development. More securing footwear, such as sandals, can be considered instead. Once the children reach school age, parents can consider loosely bound footwear, which is closer to the barefoot environment,29,31,51,52 rather than closed-toe shoes to promote healthy foot arch development. It is inconclusive whether less frequent use of footwear at toddlers' age may be beneficial to foot arch development.

Limitations and Future Directions

First, the follow-up age range of the children was too narrow. To provide more insight, future studies can consider following 3 separate cohorts of children with overlapping ages simultaneously (eg, 5–8 years, 7–10 years, and 9–12 years). Second, the approach to measure footwear factors was limited to self-reporting methods. Recall bias could have skewed the results, especially for the age at which the children first used footwear and the type of footwear worn at that time. Third, we surveyed footwear usage at onset only by age (<1 year, 1–2 years, >2 years), without considering the footwear type worn at the onset of walking, which may play an important role in influencing foot arch development. More information on the age and footwear usage when a child commences walking will be useful. Fourth, the survey questions were not validated. Future studies may need to assess footwear by visually observing the type of footwear worn by children in situ. Finally, we did not measure intrinsic foot strength, which may influence foot arch height, as suggested by the literature. Therefore, it will be beneficial to quantify intrinsic foot strength among children who use various types of footwear and between children with neutral and flatter foot types.

In conclusion, this study showed that foot arch structure of children, defined by footprint geometry and foot loading, remained stable from 7 to 9 years of age. Boys showed a slight delay in the arch development compared with girls. Children who often wore closed-toe shoes at age 7 years had a flatter foot arch than those who used sandals and slippers. Those who used slippers at toddlers' age developed a flatter foot arch when they reached later childhood compared with those who wore sandals. Clinicians may choose to commence therapy when a child is seen with painful flexible flatfoot at age 7 years and may discourage younger children from wearing slippers when they commence using footwear. However, it must be cautioned that our study was unable to show the MLA development of children before 7 years of age and after 9 years of age.

Footnotes

  • Both authors provided concept/idea/research design, writing, data collection, data analysis, project management, and fund procurement. The authors thank Ms Crystal Wee and Mr Kelvin Chua, who coordinated the data collection; Dr Chan Yiong Huak for rendering his biostatistics expertise; Dr Masato Kawabata for his helpful discussion on data analysis; and all students and teachers who assisted in the project.

  • This study was approved by the Nanyang Technological University Institutional Review Board.

  • This study was funded by the National Institute of Education Academic Research Fund.

  • Received March 30, 2015.
  • Accepted January 25, 2016.
  • © 2016 American Physical Therapy Association

References

  1. ↵
    1. Kim HW,
    2. Weinstein SL
    . Flatfoot in children: differential diagnosis and management. Curr Orthop. 2000;14:441–447.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Lin CJ,
    2. Lai KA,
    3. Kuan TS,
    4. Chou YL
    . Correlating factors and clinical significance of flexible flatfoot in preschool children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21:378–382.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Rose GK
    . Flat feet in children. Br Med J. 1990;301:1330–1331.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Viladot A
    . Nuevo método de exploración estática del pie: El fotopodograma. Clin Lab. 1954;57:114–154.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Staheli LT,
    2. Chew DE,
    3. Corbett M
    . The longitudinal arch: a survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:426–428.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Wenger DR,
    2. Mauldin D,
    3. Speck G,
    4. et al
    . Corrective shoes and inserts as treatment for flexible flatfoot in infants and children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:800–810.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Forriol F,
    2. Pascual J
    . Footprint analysis between three and seventeen years of age. Foot Ankle Int. 1990;11:101–104.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Volpon JB
    . Footprint analysis during the growth period. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14:83–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Coll MD,
    2. Viladot A,
    3. Suso S
    . Flat foot analysis in children. Rev Ortop Traumatol. 1999;3:213–220.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Staheli LT
    . Planovalgus foot deformity: current status. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1999;89:94–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Mickle KJ,
    2. Steele JR,
    3. Munro BJ
    . Is the foot structure of preschool children moderated by gender? J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28:593–596.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Dare DM,
    2. Dodwell ER
    . Pediatric flatfoot: cause, epidemiology, assessment, and treatment. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2014;26:93–100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Echarri J,
    2. Forriol F
    . The development in footprint morphology in 1851 Congolese children from urban and rural areas, and the relationship between this and wearing shoes. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2003;12:141–146.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Stavlas P,
    2. Grivas TB,
    3. Michas C,
    4. et al
    . The evolution of foot morphology in children between 6 and 17 years of age: a cross-sectional study based on footprints in a Mediterranean population. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2005;44:424–428.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Chen JP,
    2. Chung MJ,
    3. Wang MJ
    . Flatfoot prevalence and foot dimensions of 5- to 13-year-old children in Taiwan. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:326–332.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Chang JH,
    2. Wang SH,
    3. Kuo CL,
    4. et al
    . Prevalence of flexible flatfoot in Taiwanese school-aged children in relation to obesity, gender, and age. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169:447–452.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Sadeghi-Demneh E,
    2. Jafarian F,
    3. Melvin JM,
    4. et al
    . Flatfoot in school-age children: prevalence and associated factors. Foot Ankle Spec. 2015;8:186–193.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. El O,
    2. Akcali O,
    3. Kosay C,
    4. et al
    . Flexible flatfoot and related factors in primary school children: a report of a screening study. Rheumatol Int. 2006;26:1050–1053.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Bosch K,
    2. Gerss J,
    3. Rosenbaum D
    . Development of healthy children's feet: nine-year results of a longitudinal investigation of plantar loading patterns. Gait Posture. 2010;32:564–571.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Gilmour JC,
    2. Burns Y
    . The measurement of the medial longitudinal arch in children. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:493–498.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Dowling AM
    . Fat Flat Feet: Footwear for the Obese Child [PhD dissertation]. School of Health Sciences, University of Wollongong: Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia; 2006.
  22. ↵
    1. Müller S,
    2. Carlsohn A,
    3. Müller J,
    4. et al
    . Static and dynamic foot characteristics in children aged 1–13 years: a cross-sectional study. Gait Posture. 2012;35:389–394.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Onodera AN,
    2. Sacco IC,
    3. Morioka EH,
    4. et al
    . What is the best method for child longitudinal plantar arch assessment and when does arch maturation occur? Foot (Edinb). 2008;18:142–149.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Pfeiffer M,
    2. Kotz R,
    3. Ledl T,
    4. et al
    . Prevalence of flat foot in preschool-aged children. Pediatrics. 2006;118:634–639.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Villarroya MA,
    2. Esquivel JM,
    3. Tomás C,
    4. et al
    . Assessment of the medial longitudinal arch in children and adolescents with obesity: footprints and radiographic study. Eur J Pediatr. 2009;168:559–567.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Waseda A,
    2. Suda Y,
    3. Inokuchi S,
    4. et al
    . Standard growth of the foot arch in childhood and adolescence: derived from the measurement results of 10,155 children. Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;20:208–214.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Stewart SF
    . Human gait and the human foot: an ethnological study of flatfoot, I. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1970;70:111–123.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Staheli LT
    . Shoes for children: a review. Pediatrics. 1991;88:371–375.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Rao UB,
    2. Joseph B
    . The influence of footwear on the prevalence of flat foot: a survey of 2300 children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:525–527.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Mauch M,
    2. Mickle KJ,
    3. Munrob BJ,
    4. et al
    . Do the feet of German and Australian children differ in structure? Implications for children's shoe design. Ergonomics. 2008;51:527–539.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Walther M,
    2. Herold D,
    3. Sinderhauf A,
    4. Morrison R
    . Children sport shoes: a systematic review of current literature. Foot Ankle Surg. 2008;14:180–189.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Didia BC,
    2. Omu ET,
    3. Obuoforibo AA
    . The use of Footprint Contact Index II for classification of flat feet in a Nigerian population. Foot Ankle Int. 1987;7:285–289.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Sachithanandam V,
    2. Joseph B
    . The influence of footwear on the prevalence of flat foot: a survey of 1846 skeletally mature persons. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:254–257.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Riddiford-Harland DL,
    2. Steele JR,
    3. Baur LA
    . Medial midfoot fat pad thickness and plantar pressures: Are these related in children? Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6:261–266.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Tong JW,
    2. Kong PW
    . Reliability of footprint geometric and plantar loading measurements in children using the Emed® M system. Gait Posture. 2013;38:281–286.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Rosenbaum D,
    2. Westhues M,
    3. Bosch K
    . Effect of gait speed changes on foot loading characteristics in children. Gait Posture. 2013;38:1058–1060.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Hughes J,
    2. Pratt L,
    3. Linge K,
    4. et al
    . Reliability of pressure measurements: the EMED F system. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1991;6:14–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. ↵
    1. Zammit G,
    2. Menz H,
    3. Munteanu S
    . Reliability of the TekScan MatScan® system for the measurement of plantar forces and pressures during barefoot level walking in healthy adults. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010;3:11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Shek DT,
    2. Ma CM
    . Longitudinal data analyses using linear mixed models in SPSS: concepts, procedures and illustrations. ScientificWorldJournal. 2011;11:42–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Menz HB
    . Analysis of paired data in physical therapy research: time to stop double-dipping? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35:477–478.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    1. Bosch K,
    2. Rosenbaum D
    . Gait symmetry improves in childhood: a 4-year follow-up of foot loading data. Gait Posture. 2010;32:464–468.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    1. Kouchi M,
    2. Mochimaru M,
    3. Mientje M,
    4. Koch DB
    . Child foot shape: difference between three countries. Footwear Sci. 2009;1:118–120.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. ↵
    1. Grueger B
    . Footwear for children. 2009. Available at: http://www.cps.ca/documents/position/footwear-for-children. Accessed August 11, 2015.
  44. ↵
    1. McInerny TK,
    2. Adam HM,
    3. Campbell DE
    1. Hoekelman RA,
    2. Chianese MJ
    . Presenting signs and symptoms. In: McInerny TK, Adam HM, Campbell DE, eds. American Academy of Pediatrics Textbook of Pediatric Care. 5th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2009:2689.
  45. ↵
    1. Abolarin T,
    2. Aiyegbusi A,
    3. Tella B,
    4. Akinbo S
    . Predictive factors for flatfoot: the role of age and footwear in children in urban and rural communities in South West Nigeria. Foot (Edinb). 2011;21:188–192.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Mulligan EP,
    2. Cook PG
    . Effect of plantar intrinsic muscle training on medial longitudinal arch morphology and dynamic function. Man Ther. 2013;18:425–430.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Lynn SK,
    2. Padilla RA,
    3. Tsang KK
    . Differences in static- and dynamic-balance task performance after 4 weeks of intrinsic-foot-muscle training: the short-foot exercise versus the towel-curl exercise. J Sport Rehabil. 2012;21:327–333.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    1. Lee CR,
    2. Kim MK,
    3. Cho MS
    . The relationship between balance and foot pressure in fatigue of the plantar intrinsic foot muscles of adults with flexible flatfoot. J Phys Ther Sci. 2012;24:699–701.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. ↵
    1. Headlee DL,
    2. Leonard JL,
    3. Hart JM,
    4. et al
    . Fatigue of the plantar intrinsic foot muscles increases navicular drop. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008;18:420–425.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Thomson P,
    2. Volpe RG
    1. Lang L
    . Growth and development. In: Thomson P, Volpe RG, eds. Introduction to Podopadiatrics. London, United Kingdom: Churchill Livingstone; 2001:26–29.
  51. ↵
    1. Wolf S,
    2. Simon J,
    3. Patikas D,
    4. et al
    . Foot motion in children shoes: a comparison of barefoot walking with shod walking in conventional and flexible shoes. Gait Posture. 2008;27:51–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. ↵
    1. Wegener C,
    2. Hunt AE,
    3. Vanwanseele B,
    4. et al
    . Effect of children's shoes on gait: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res. 2011;4:3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 96 Issue 8 Table of Contents
Physical Therapy: 96 (8)

Issue highlights

  • Role of Physical Therapists in Reducing Hospital Readmissions: Optimizing Outcomes for Older Adults During Care Transitions From Hospital to Community
  • Prevalence of Wheelchair and Scooter Use Among Community-Dwelling Canadians
  • Metatarsophalangeal Hyperextension Movement Pattern Related to Diabetic Forefoot Deformity
  • Coordination and Symmetry Patterns During the Drop Vertical Jump in People With Chronic Ankle Instability and Lateral Ankle Sprain Copers
  • Critical and Theoretical Perspective on Scapular Stabilization: What Does It Really Mean, and Are We on the Right Track?
  • Effects of Pilates-Based Core Stability Training in Ambulant People With Multiple Sclerosis: Multicenter, Assessor-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Adding Psychosocial Factors Does Not Improve Predictive Models for People With Spinal Pain Enough to Warrant Extensive Screening for Them at Baseline
  • Cervico-ocular Reflex Is Increased in People With Nonspecific Neck Pain
  • Expanded Distribution of Pain as a Sign of Central Sensitization in Individuals With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis
  • Obstacle Crossing During Gait in Children With Cerebral Palsy: Cross-Sectional Study With Kinematic Analysis of Dynamic Balance and Trunk Control
  • Medial Longitudinal Arch Development of Children Aged 7 to 9 Years: Longitudinal Investigation
  • Limitations in the Activity of Mobility at Age 6 Years After Difficult Birth at Term: Prospective Cohort Study
  • From Persuasion to Coercion: Responding to the Reluctant Patient in Rehabilitation
  • “Crawling Out of the Cocoon”: Patients' Experiences of a Physical Therapy Exercise Intervention in the Treatment of Major Depression
  • Preliminary Evaluation of a Modified STarT Back Screening Tool Across Different Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions
  • Validation of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Vocational Rehabilitation From the Perspective of Physical Therapists: International Delphi Survey
  • Test-Retest Reliability of Dual-Task Outcome Measures in People With Parkinson Disease
  • Development of a Feasible Implementation Fidelity Protocol Within a Complex Physical Therapy–Led Self-Management Intervention
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on JCORE Reference.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Medial Longitudinal Arch Development of Children Aged 7 to 9 Years: Longitudinal Investigation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from JCORE Reference
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the JCORE Reference web site.
Print
Medial Longitudinal Arch Development of Children Aged 7 to 9 Years: Longitudinal Investigation
Jasper W.K. Tong, Pui W. Kong
Physical Therapy Aug 2016, 96 (8) 1216-1224; DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20150192

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Download Powerpoint
Save to my folders

Share
Medial Longitudinal Arch Development of Children Aged 7 to 9 Years: Longitudinal Investigation
Jasper W.K. Tong, Pui W. Kong
Physical Therapy Aug 2016, 96 (8) 1216-1224; DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20150192
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Reliability and Validity of Force Platform Measures of Balance Impairment in Individuals With Parkinson Disease
  • Predictors of Reduced Frequency of Physical Activity 3 Months After Injury: Findings From the Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study
  • Effects of Locomotor Exercise Intensity on Gait Performance in Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
Show more Pediatrics

Subjects

  • Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics: Other
  • Musculoskeletal System/Orthopedic
    • Kinesiology/Biomechanics
    • Injuries and Conditions: Foot
    • Anatomy and Physiology: Musculoskeletal System

Footer Menu 1

  • menu 1 item 1
  • menu 1 item 2
  • menu 1 item 3
  • menu 1 item 4

Footer Menu 2

  • menu 2 item 1
  • menu 2 item 2
  • menu 2 item 3
  • menu 2 item 4

Footer Menu 3

  • menu 3 item 1
  • menu 3 item 2
  • menu 3 item 3
  • menu 3 item 4

Footer Menu 4

  • menu 4 item 1
  • menu 4 item 2
  • menu 4 item 3
  • menu 4 item 4
footer second
footer first
Copyright © 2013 The HighWire JCore Reference Site | Print ISSN: 0123-4567 | Online ISSN: 1123-4567
advertisement bottom
Advertisement Top