Abstract
Background Accurate measurement of physical activity and sedentary behavior is an important consideration for health care professionals. The activPAL activity monitor has not been validated against a criterion measure for people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Objective The objective of this study was to determine the criterion validity of the activPAL activity monitor for measuring step counts, transition counts, and time spent in sedentary, standing, and walking behaviors in people with RA.
Design A laboratory-based criterion validation study was conducted.
Methods Participants with a confirmed medical diagnosis of RA were recruited from 2 outpatient rheumatology clinics. The testing procedure consisted of standardized testing components and tasks related to activities of daily living. Participants wore an activPAL activity monitor and were video recorded throughout the testing procedure. Direct observation was used as the criterion measure. Data analysis consisted of validation analysis of the activPAL activity monitor data and the criterion measure data.
Results Twenty-four people participated in the study. Data from 20 participants were included in the final analysis. The activPAL significantly underestimated step counts by 26% and transition counts by 36%. There was no significant difference between the activPAL activity monitor and the criterion measure for time spent in sedentary, standing or light activity, and walking behaviors.
Limitations Validation of activities of daily living in a laboratory environment is a limitation of this study.
Conclusions The activPAL activity monitor underestimated step and transition counts and, therefore, is not valid for measuring these outcomes in people with RA. Relative to direct observation, the activPAL activity monitor is valid for measuring time spent in sedentary, standing, and walking behaviors in people with RA.
Footnotes
Ms Larkin, Dr Nordgren, Dr Fraser, and Dr Kennedy provided concept/idea/research design, project management, and consultation (including review of manuscript before submission). Ms Larkin, Dr Nordgren, Dr Purtill, and Dr Kennedy provided writing and data analysis. Ms Larkin, Dr Nordgren, Mr Brand, and Dr Fraser provided data collection. Dr Nordgren and Dr Fraser provided participants. Ms Larkin and Dr Kennedy provided facilities/equipment. Ms Larkin, Dr Fraser, and Dr Kennedy provided institutional liaisons. Ms Larkin provided administrative support. The authors thank the participants in the study for facilitating this research. The authors also thank Professor Ailish Hannigan and Dr Kieran Dowd for their assistance in analyzing and interpreting the study findings.
The study was approved by the Mid-Western Regional Hospital Research Ethics Committee.
This work was supported by the primary author (L.L.) as part of a PhD qualification.
- Received May 14, 2015.
- Accepted November 22, 2015.
- © 2016 American Physical Therapy Association
Issue highlights
