Skip to main content
  • Other Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
Advertisement
JCORE Reference
this is the JCORE Reference site slogan
  • Home
  • Most Read
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Patients
  • Reference Site Links
    • View Regions
  • Archive

In Pursuit of the Ever-Expanding Shoreline

Alan M. Jette
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.2016.96.2.134 Published 1 February 2016
Alan M. Jette
A.M. Jette, PT, PhD, FAPTA, is Editor in Chief of PTJ.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Professor Michael Smithson,1 who has written on the topic of ignorance, uses the very helpful metaphor of a “knowledge island,” which was introduced to me by Dr. Sandro Galea, Dean of the Boston University School of Public Health.2 The more we know, the bigger the knowledge island becomes. We are most comfortable at the center of the island, where we know what we know; however, the bigger the island, the longer the island's shoreline, where the limits of our knowledge lie. As researchers and clinicians, we grapple with the fact that we spend much of our time on that shoreline, at the intersection of knowledge and ignorance.

In an opinion piece in The New York Times, Jamie Holmes noted that the study of ignorance—agnotology—is growing.3 We could extrapolate from his essay that physical therapist education programs should emphasize the teaching of ignorance, not evidence-based practice. As Holmes argued, the study of ignorance rests at the ever-expanding shoreline of knowledge.

I find the Times opinion piece fascinating as I consider how clinicians and scientists go about their work and as I contemplate the rightful role of a professional journal such as PTJ.

As rehabilitation professionals, we aspire to improve our patients' health and to produce scholarship that helps us understand how to do that ever more effectively. Success rests on the production of new knowledge—on getting ourselves to the center of the knowledge island so that we can then design new clinical treatments. For instance, a growing body of scholarship suggests that physical therapist intervention in the intensive care unit (ICU) improves functional mobility, promotes weaning from mechanical ventilation, and reduces hospital readmissions,4,5 and the physical therapy profession has been advocating strongly for the introduction of physical therapists in the ICU to improve patients' health.6 Similarly, there is evidence that falls in the elderly can be prevented by screening to detect risk factors and by the implementation of tailored interventions by the physical therapist or other health care professionals.7

But what about when the evidence is ambiguous—when we are walking on the shores of the island? What do we do when we do not know what the right intervention is? This state is far from uncommon, and, in fact, is probably much more the norm in physical therapy and rehabilitation than we would like to admit. Take low back pain, the world's major cause of disability. Most systematic reviews on treatment have recommended various physical therapist interventions, such as strengthening, endurance, directional preference exercise, manual therapy, and trunk coordination.8 However, as Azevedo and colleagues recently noted,9 some studies comparing the relative effectiveness of these interventions have shown small-to-moderate clinical effects, with no treatment strategies that are clearly superior. What are we to do with such clinical uncertainty and ambiguity?

“Our students need to become comfortable in the grays of the shoreline, and to understand that physical therapy remains a pragmatic discipline even when there is uncertainty.”

As clinicians, we need to recognize that ignorance is an inevitable part of what we do. Interventions might not be necessarily based on published evidence, and we can—and frequently should—act even when we do not know all the answers. Action can be predicated on theory, on past clinical experience, on the likely prognosis in our patients, or on scientific evidence. But when we act in the absence of scientific evidence, we should not do so on false pretexts, invoking knowledge and clarity when in fact ignorance of causal effect and ambiguity are the order of the day.

It is okay to admit that we currently lack evidence of the comparative effectiveness of different physical therapist interventions for the treatment of chronic low back pain; it is okay to admit that the evidence is not entirely clear regarding exactly what interventions should be provided after screening to prevent falls in the elderly. Ignorance is a great motivator. It drives us to find the evidence about when, why, and how we should intervene. It also motivates us to intervene with honesty about the uncertainties, allowing us the option of changing course when some of our ignorance falls away in favor of new evidence.

As scientists and researchers, we have the extraordinary privilege of focusing on the expansion of the knowledge island. Although ambiguity about the effectiveness of a physical therapist intervention is never a cause for celebration, it does give occasion for important questions to be asked, interesting studies to be conducted, and vital answers to be discovered. What could be more engaging for those of us charged with generating knowledge as our core mission? Our patients compel us to engage big clinical questions. We want to understand the causes of movement impairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions—to generate new evidence so that new knowledge can be disseminated to those who are in a position to improve patients' health.

As teachers, we know that ignorance and ambiguity based on tradition and experience are far less useful to transmit to our students than scientific evidence. However, false certitude is a temptation and not without consequence. The obvious unintended outcome is the taking of action that turns out to be inadvertently harmful. Physical and neurocognitive impairments secondary to critical illness in patients in the ICU are pervasive,8 and patients and families cry for rapid answers; there is pressure to take clinical action. Surely we need to know which interventions will be most efficacious so that we can act quickly to reduce the barriers preventing us from helping these patients! Embracing our ignorance frees us to be clear about when we do not know what to do and to articulate more definitively when and how to act. It also suggests that we should prepare our students to deal with the ambiguity of “inadequate evidence for practice,” similar to Craik's 2001 call for “a tolerance for ambiguity.”10 Our students need to be comfortable in the grays of the shoreline, and to understand that physical therapy remains a pragmatic discipline even when there is uncertainty. In my view, the embrace of ignorance is just as important as the adoption of evidence-based practice.

What is the role of PTJ with respect to the ever-expanding shoreline of the knowledge island? First, PTJ serves as an important vehicle for disseminating new knowledge and moving more physical therapists to the center of the island so that they may then design new clinical interventions to promote the health of our patients. Second, PTJ has the obligation to assist our profession in identifying where clinical ambiguity exists, providing a forum for important questions to be raised, and formulating interesting studies to be conducted.

Finally, PTJ will support the training of our emerging clinicians and scholars by providing content that helps them to be more at ease with the partnership between knowledge and ignorance—and to accept that much of their careers will happen on the ambiguous shoreline.

  • © 2016 American Physical Therapy Association

References

  1. ↵
    1. Smithson M
    . Ignorance and Uncertainty: Emerging Paradigms. New York, NY: Springer; 1989.
  2. ↵
    1. Galea S
    . On Ignorance and Public Health. Dean's Note. Available at: http://www.bu.edu/sph/2015/09/20/on-ignorance-and-public-health/. Accessed December 23, 2015.
  3. ↵
    1. Holmes J
    . The Case for Teaching Ignorance. The New York Times. August 24, 2015. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/24/opinion/the-case-for-teaching-ignorance.html. Accessed December 23, 2015.
  4. ↵
    1. Needham DM
    . Mobilizing patients in the intensive care unit: improving neuromuscular weakness and physical function. JAMA. 2008;300:1685–1690.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Burtin C,
    2. Clerckx B,
    3. Robbeets C,
    4. et al
    . Early exercise in critically ill patients enhances short-term functional recovery. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2499–2505.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Malone D,
    2. Ridgeway K,
    3. Nordon-Craft A,
    4. et al
    . Physical therapist practice in the intensive care unit: results of a national survey. Phys Ther. 2015;95;1335–1344.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Avin KG,
    2. Hanke TA,
    3. Kirk-Sanchez N,
    4. et al
    . Management of falls in community-dwelling older adults: clinical guidance statement from the Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy of the American Physical Therapy Association. Phys Ther. 2015;95:815–834.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Van Middelkoop M,
    2. Rubinstein SM,
    3. Kuijpers T,
    4. et al
    . A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:19–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Azevedo DC,
    2. Van Dillen LR,
    3. Santos HO,
    4. et al
    . Movement system impairment–based classification versus general exercise for chronic low back pain: protocol of a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2015;95:1287–1294.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Craik RL
    . A tolerance for ambiguity. Phys Ther. 2001;81:1292–1294.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 96 Issue 2 Table of Contents
Physical Therapy: 96 (2)

Issue highlights

  • Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Implementation Opportunity, or Just Another Fad?
  • Unpacking Payment Bundles
  • Role of Physical Therapists in the Management of Individuals at Risk for or Diagnosed With Venous Thromboembolism: Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline
  • Association of Varus Thrust With Pain and Stiffness and Activities of Daily Living in Patients With Medial Knee Osteoarthritis
  • Assessing the Reliability and Validity of a Physical Therapy Functional Measurement Tool—the Modified Iowa Level of Assistance Scale—in Acute Hospital Inpatients
  • Predictors of Independent Walking in Young Children With Cerebral Palsy
  • Telehealth Implementation in a Skilled Nursing Facility: Case Report for Physical Therapist Practice in Washington
  • Hospital Readmission Following Discharge From Inpatient Rehabilitation for Older Adults With Debility
  • Examining the Association Between Comorbidity Indexes and Functional Status in Hospitalized Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries
  • Which Children Are Not Getting Their Needs for Therapy or Mobility Aids Met? Data From the 2009–2010 National Survey of Children With Special Health Care Needs
  • Impact of Out-of-Pocket Expenditure on Physical Therapy Utilization for Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Secondary Analysis of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Data
  • Utilization and Payments of Office-Based Physical Rehabilitation Services Among Individuals With Commercial Insurance in New York State
  • Sitting and Activity Time in People With Stroke
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on JCORE Reference.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Pursuit of the Ever-Expanding Shoreline
(Your Name) has sent you a message from JCORE Reference
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the JCORE Reference web site.
Print
In Pursuit of the Ever-Expanding Shoreline
Alan M. Jette
Physical Therapy Feb 2016, 96 (2) 134-136; DOI: 10.2522/ptj.2016.96.2.134

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Save to my folders

Share
In Pursuit of the Ever-Expanding Shoreline
Alan M. Jette
Physical Therapy Feb 2016, 96 (2) 134-136; DOI: 10.2522/ptj.2016.96.2.134
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • The Revolving Hospital Door
  • Meeting the Challenge of the High-Need, High-Cost Population
  • Partnering With Oxford University Press
Show more Editorials

Subjects

  • Editorials
    • All Editorials
    • Alan Jette

Footer Menu 1

  • menu 1 item 1
  • menu 1 item 2
  • menu 1 item 3
  • menu 1 item 4

Footer Menu 2

  • menu 2 item 1
  • menu 2 item 2
  • menu 2 item 3
  • menu 2 item 4

Footer Menu 3

  • menu 3 item 1
  • menu 3 item 2
  • menu 3 item 3
  • menu 3 item 4

Footer Menu 4

  • menu 4 item 1
  • menu 4 item 2
  • menu 4 item 3
  • menu 4 item 4
footer second
footer first
Copyright © 2013 The HighWire JCore Reference Site | Print ISSN: 0123-4567 | Online ISSN: 1123-4567
advertisement bottom
Advertisement Top