Abstract
Background and Purpose Current approaches to upper limb rehabilitation are not sufficient to drive neural reorganization and maximize recovery after stroke. To address this evidence-practice gap, a knowledge translation intervention using the Behaviour Change Wheel was developed. The intervention involves collaboratively working with stroke therapy teams to change their practice and increase therapy intensity by therapists prescribing supplementary self-directed arm exercise. The purposes of this case series are: (1) to provide an illustrative example of how a research-informed process changed clinical practice and (2) to report on staff members' and patients' perceptions of the utility of the developed intervention.
Case Descriptions A participatory action research approach was used in 3 stroke rehabilitation units in the United Kingdom. The intervention aimed to change 4 therapist-level behaviors: (1) screening patients for suitability for supplementary self-directed arm exercise, (2) provision of exercises, (3) involving family and caregivers in assisting with exercises, and (4) monitoring and progressing exercises. Data on changes in practice were collected by therapy teams using a bespoke audit tool. Utility of the intervention was explored in qualitative interviews with patients and staff.
Outcomes Components of the intervention were successfully embedded in 2 of the 3 stroke units. At these sites, almost all admitted patients were screened for suitability for supplementary self-directed exercise. Exercises were provided to 77%, 70%, and 88% of suitable patients across the 3 sites. Involving family and caregivers and monitoring and progressing exercises were not performed consistently.
Conclusions This case series is an example of how a rigorous research-informed knowledge translation process resulted in practice change. Research is needed to demonstrate that these changes can translate into increased intensity of upper limb exercise and affect patient outcomes.
Footnotes
Dr Connell, Ms McMahon, and Dr Eng provided concept/idea/project design. All authors provided writing. Dr Connell and Ms McMahon provided data collection and analysis. Dr Connell, Ms McMahon, and Professor Tyson provided project management. Dr Connell and Professor Watkins provided fund procurement. Professor Tyson and Dr Eng provided consultation (including review of manuscript before submission).
This work was approved by the National Research Ethics Service (NRES), REC number 14/NW/1087, IRAS project ID: 157255.
Dr Connell is funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Career Development Fellowship. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the NIHR, or the Department of Health.
- Received December 24, 2015.
- Accepted May 30, 2016.
- © 2016 American Physical Therapy Association