Skip to main content
  • Other Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
Advertisement
JCORE Reference
this is the JCORE Reference site slogan
  • Home
  • Most Read
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Patients
  • Reference Site Links
    • View Regions
  • Archive

Corrective Bandage for Conservative Treatment of Metatarsus Adductus: Retrospective Study

Elia Utrilla-Rodríguez, María Jesús Guerrero-Martínez-Cañavete, Manuel Albornoz-Cabello, Pedro V. Munuera-Martínez
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20140443 Published 1 January 2016
Elia Utrilla-Rodríguez
E. Utrilla-Rodríguez, PhD, Paediatric Rehabilitation Service, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Avd. Dr. Fedriani, 3, 41071 Seville, Spain.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
María Jesús Guerrero-Martínez-Cañavete
M.J. Guerrero-Martínez-Cañavete, PT, Paediatric Rehabilitation Service, Virgen Macarena University Hospital.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manuel Albornoz-Cabello
M. Albornoz-Cabello, PhD, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pedro V. Munuera-Martínez
P.V. Munuera-Martínez, PhD, Department of Podiatry, University of Seville.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Metatarsus adductus (MA) is the most common congenital foot deformity observed in children.

Objectives The aims of this study were: (1) to analyze the evolution of a corrective bandage for semirigid MA in newborns and (2) to recommend the age interval at which to start treatment of MA with the corrective bandage alone, without the need of splints.

Design An observational clinical study was conducted.

Methods The study was conducted at Virgen Macarena University Hospital in Seville, Spain. Children born with semirigid MA at the hospital during the years 2010–2011 were included. Corrective bandaging was applied to all children until clinical correction of the deformity. Sex, laterality of the deformity, weight and length of the newborn, age at the start of treatment, antecedents related to the pregnancy and birth, type of treatment (bandaging, splints), and correction or no correction with bandaging alone were recorded. Age differences at the start of the bandaging treatment between children whose deformity was corrected with and without the need of splints were examined. The receiver operating characteristic curve method was applied to analyze the predictive ability of the age at the start of bandaging treatment relative to whether the deformity was corrected or not corrected with bandaging alone.

Results The bandage achieved complete correction in 68.1% of the children and corrected the deformity more frequently in girls compared with boys. Of the 56 children who began the treatment within the first month of life, 92.8% achieved correction of the foot deformity with the corrective bandaging alone.

Limitations Patients' follow-up time was only 2 years, so it was only feasible to analyze the corrective bandaging method over the short term and medium term.

Conclusions Corrective bandages showed high effectiveness, particularly in girls, and overall when started within the first month of life.

Metatarsus adductus (MA) is the most common congenital foot deformity observed in children, and its frequency has increased in recent years (1–3 cases per 1,000 newborns).1–3 It is a complex deformity that requires knowledge of its causal components prior to correct treatment,4,5 as treatment and expected outcomes will differ accordingly. In people with MA, there is a disorder of the alignment of the forefoot, with varying degrees of adduction and supination (Fig. 1). Moreover, the outer side edge of the foot is convex, with a lateral and dorsal prominence at the base of the fifth metatarsal and cuboid bone. Although the calcaneus is in a valgus position, there is no equinus deformity, in contrast to a clubfoot. In some cases, the deformity improves or corrects itself spontaneously. However, if these outcomes do not occur and the deformity is not treated, the child will have an altered gait (ie, he or she will walk with the toes pointed toward the midline [in-toeing]) and may experience recurrent tripping, which could have a significant impact on both the child and parents.6 This dysfunction results in an increased number of falls due to the child's consequent psychomotor retardation.7,8 Furthermore, in the long term, the pressure exerted by the shoe may be a predisposing factor for the development of hallux valgus.3,9

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

One-day-old child with metatarsus adductus.

The classification used for years at Virgen Macarena University Hospital (Seville, Spain) for this deformity is the following:9 (1) grade 1, where there is adduction of the forefoot without inversion and the individual is able to perform abduction passively or by means of stimulation of the peroneal musculature; (2) grade 2, where the foot is slightly shortened, the forefoot is in adduction and inversion, the external border of the foot is convex (with prominent base of the fifth metatarsal), and the internal border is concave, with normal longitudinal arc, and the deformity can be partially corrected; and (3) grade 3, which corresponds to feet with more structured deformity because we have to add kidney-shaped form to the features reported above, with transversal sulci in the medial region of the foot, increased internal longitudinal arc, and marked longitudinal shortening of the foot, and passive correction of the forefoot is not possible. Cases of grade 3 deformity require surgery, whereas grade 1 and 2 cases can be corrected traditionally.9

Treatment of the foot with MA varies depending on the degree of misalignment, ranging from observation and monitoring in mild cases to the placement of serial casts, thermoplastic splints, and even surgery in the most severe cases.10,11 Many authors agree that the best therapeutic option will depend on the initial flexibility of the foot, which ranges from a waiting attitude in mild cases to surgery for the stiffest feet.2,4,7,9,12–15 There is general consensus that, in the most flexible cases (grade 1 MA, according to the Virgen Macarena University Hospital classification9), a vigilant attitude should be adopted, or parents should be taught foot flexibility exercises for the child to perform regularly at home. However, to our knowledge, there is little scientific literature supporting successful treatments of more severe cases of MA. Thus, determining the most appropriate treatment remains controversial. Several studies of semirigid (grade 2) MA have shown that treatment with serial casts below the knee is the most common therapy.1,4,10,16–18 This treatment is followed, in frequency, by the placement of position-correcting splints and parental control of the child's sitting and sleeping postures.4,12,16,19 Although this is a rather aggressive treatment, in our opinion, simpler and more cost-effective techniques could be developed (ie, by means of corrective bandages). To our knowledge, only a few studies have recommended treatment with corrective bandaging as the primary conservative treatment option.9,13,14 This technique has the advantage of allowing daily manipulation and correction of the foot, as well as reducing treatment time and cost.

The main aim of this study was to ascertain the effectiveness of a corrective bandaging treatment for semirigid (grade 2) MA in newborns at Virgen Macarena University Hospital. Another aim was to establish the most recommended age interval at which to start this treatment to achieve correction of the deformity with bandaging alone, without applying splints.

Method

Design

A retrospective study was designed with children born with semirigid (grade 2) MA during the years 2010–2011 who were treated with corrective bandaging. The study was performed at Virgen Macarena University Hospital.

Participants

The inclusion criteria included having been diagnosed with grade 2 MA according to the Virgen Macarena University Hospital classification9 and having received no prior treatment. The exclusion criteria were patients with skeletal dysplasia, neuromuscular pathology, or other abnormalities of the foot and children whose medical records were incomplete or who had not completed treatment. The final number of patients who met the selection criteria was 94.

Tests and Measures

The variables recorded were: sex (male or female), laterality of the deformity (unilateral right or left, or bilateral), weight (in grams) and length (in centimeters) of the newborn, age (in days) at the start of the treatment, antecedents related to the pregnancy and birth (normal vaginal, cesarean section, vacuum suction, or forceps), type of treatment (bandaging, splints) and its duration (in days), and whether the deformity was corrected with bandaging alone.

Two experienced physical therapists treated all of the children in the same manner (E.U-R.: 22 years as a physical therapist, with 18 years of experience as a pediatric physical therapist; and M.J.G-M-C.: 40 years as a physical therapist, with 37 years of experience as a pediatric physical therapist).

Procedure

Treatment with corrective bandaging was performed by physical therapists with more than 20 years of experience in the children's physical therapy unit at our hospital. Treatment sessions were conducted 5 days a week for approximately 15 minutes per foot and consisted of corrective manipulation to flex the retracted structures of the foot and stimulation of the peroneal muscles with a toothbrush. Subsequently, corrective bandaging was applied, using cotton bandages and strips of adhesive dressing placed from the base of the first metatarsal to the top of the leg.

Bandaging was done in a distal-to-proximal direction. After several layers of cotton bandage, strips of adhesive dressing were placed over the head of the first metatarsal and on the plantar surface of the remaining metatarsals ending on top of the leg, under the knee (Fig. 2). Thereafter, several layers of bandage were applied to maintain plaster strip tension and correction achieved during manipulation. The bandage was not so tight as to compromise circulation and was examined before the child left the physical therapy unit. If necessary, it was removed and replaced with another bandage.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Cotton bandage and end of the strip of adhesive tape, below the knee.

The bandaging was renewed every other day until the deformity was clinically corrected. Correction criteria included complete correction of the external convexity of the foot, no protuberance of the fifth metatarsal base, and balance in the musculature of the foot.8 The children were followed up at 2 years after treatment initiation.

Data Analysis

The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 20 (IBM Corp, Armonk, New York). The analysis included a general descriptive analysis with determination of the means and standard deviations of the quantitative variables measured and absolute and relative frequencies (as percentages) of the qualitative variables. Next, the potential associations of the variables of laterality, sex, and type of birth with the effectiveness of the bandaging treatment were evaluated using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test (in the case of 2 × 2 contingency tables). Age differences at the start of the bandaging treatment between children whose deformity was corrected without splints and those who needed splints were examined using the Mann-Whitney U test. A subsequent test of potential age differences was performed by grouping the ages at the start of treatment into 4 intervals and comparing the cases that did or did not require splints using the chi-square test. Finally, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve method was applied to analyze the predictive ability of age at the start of the bandaging treatment relative to whether the deformity was corrected with bandaging alone or whether splints would be required. Values of the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity as well as positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were determined. In all of the analyses, significance level (α) was established at .05, with a confidence level of .95. Also, the β value (type II error) was established a priori at 0.2, with a power (1 − β) of 0.8.

Results

Descriptive Data

A total of 94 children with grade 2 MA were studied. Of these children, 54.3% (51/94) were girls, 45.7% (43/94) were boys, 80.9% (76/94) were affected bilaterally, and 19.1% (18/94) were affected unilaterally. In the unilaterally affected cases, 38.8% (7/18) were left feet and 61.1% (11/18) were right feet. Regarding the type of delivery, 69.1% (65/94) were normal vaginal delivery, 18.1% (17/94) were cesarean section, 8.5% (8/94) were vacuum suction, and 4.3% (4/94) were forceps delivery. The values of the remaining quantitative variables recorded are listed in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics of the Quantitative Variables Used in the Study

Effectiveness of Corrective Bandages

Importantly, regarding the effectiveness of the treatment with bandaging, the foot deformities of 68.1% (64/94) of the children with MA, regardless of whether unilaterally or bilaterally affected, were corrected with bandaging alone. In addition, in the remaining 31.9% (30/94) of the children, it was necessary to apply a posterior splint. The bandaging treatment was more effective in girls compared with boys: 78.4% (40/51) of the girls did not need a splint versus 55.8% (24/43) of the boys (P=.017). As shown in Table 1, the mean number of bandages required for clinical correction was 7.74. The nearest round number would be 8 bandages. As the bandages were changed every other day, it could be upheld that the mean time required for treatment was 16 days.

Recommended Age Interval at Which to Start Treatment With Corrective Bandages

Comparison of the time from birth to the start of treatment between children for whom the correction of the deformity was obtained with bandaging alone and those for whom it was necessary to apply splints showed that a favorable outcome was more likely to occur the earlier the treatment was initiated (Mann-Whitney U test=151.5, P<.001). The mean age at which treatment was started was 23.41 days (SD=21.07) in children for whom the correction was achieved with bandaging alone (n=64) and 107.63 days (SD=64.41) in children for whom splints were necessary (n=30).

The ages at the start of the treatment were binned into 4 intervals: (1) up to 2 weeks (28 children; 2 required half-cast plaster splints), (2) between 2 weeks and 1 month (28 children; 2 needed splints), (3) between 1 and 3 months (26 children; 14 needed splints), and (4) more than 3 months (12 children; all needed splints) (Tab. 2). There was a significant difference between the children who had started treatment before 1 month of age and the remaining children, independent of the need for splints (χ2=41.17, P<.001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

Distribution of Children Who Needed and Who Did Not Need Half-Cast Plaster Splints, by Intervals of Age at the Start of the Bandaging Treatment

The ROC curve was calculated to obtain a predictive value for age (in days) at the start of treatment as a predictor of whether a splint would be needed. In this study, 30 children needed splints, and 64 children did not need splints. For the children who needed a splint, the ROC curve values were selected to be positive, and the value of the AUC was computed (X̅=0.921; standard error=0.034; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.855, 0.987; P<.001) (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Receiver operating characteristic curve graphic. 1 – specificity is represented instead of specificity so that correctly diagnosed cases can stay under the curve. In that way, false positives and false negatives would stay above the curve.

The optimum value of the age at which to start the treatment was obtained for a value of AUC equal to 0.921. This optimum value corresponded to the sensitivity. In particular, the sensitivity at this optimum was 0.933 (95% CI=0.787, 0.982), and the specificity was 0.719 (95% CI=0.599, 0.814). Using these data, the optimal age for starting treatment was 4 weeks (>27.50 days). The results with this criterion, as well as the odds ratios derived from those data, are listed in Table 3. The corresponding PPV (true positives/[true positives + false positives]) was 61% (95% CI=46.5%, 73.6%), and the NPV (true negatives/[true negatives + false negatives]) was 96% (95% CI=86.0%, 98.8%).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3.

Prediction of the Need for Plaster Half-Cast Splints for the Treatment of Metatarsus Adductusa

Experimental Power Calculation

The experimental power calculation is presented in the Appendix.

Discussion

In this article, a new method of treatment based on the application of corrective bandaging is described. This technique was performed on 94 patients with MA of grade 2 severity according to the Virgen Macarena University Hospital classification.9 Only a few references using this approach have been found in the literature.9,13,14 The present study showed that the feet were completely corrected with this treatment in 68.1% of the patients and that the mean time required for treatment was 16 days, which clearly indicate the effectiveness of the treatment, both clinically and in terms of cost-effectiveness. The clinical correction was maintained during the 2 years of follow-up.

Many authors agree that the best therapeutic option will be dependent on the initial flexibility of the foot, which ranges from a waiting attitude in mild cases to surgery for the stiffest feet.2,4,7,9,12–15 There is general consensus that, in the most flexible cases (grade 1 MA, according to the Virgen Macarena University Hospital classification9), a vigilant attitude should be adopted, or the parents should be taught foot flexibility exercises for the child to perform regularly at home.

Different treatment possibilities have been proposed, such as in cases where the deformity is semirigid (grade 2). In the literature, the treatment of choice is usually serial casts, as reflected in studies from the mid-20th century1,4,8,13,17 in which acceptable results for the correction of the MA foot deformity were found after the placement of serial casts, with treatment duration from 6 to 12 weeks.

Another commonly proposed treatment method is the application of corrective splints. This treatment has been advocated by Votta and Weber20 and Chong,21 and recently by Herzenberg and Burghardt,22 who performed a clinical trial using 43 feet with MA and compared the correction obtained with serial casts with that obtained using splints. The results of the latter study showed that the 2 methods provided similar corrections. Moreover, although the cost was much less with a splint, the treatment time was 6 weeks with casts compared with 12 weeks with a splint.

Surgical treatment in the most severe or most rigid cases has been advocated by some authors,23,24 although this approach has more secondary complications and longer recovery times. The procedure may involve adductor tenotomy of the abductor hallucis muscle, an anteromedial release of the foot, or even a percutaneous correction, as described by Knörr et al25 in a study on 34 feet with MA treated using this technique.

Analysis of the results in the present study showed that the feet with MA that were not completely corrected with bandaging and required the use of splints were those for which treatment was initiated relatively late. Of the 56 children who began treatment within the first month of life, 92.8% achieved correction of the foot deformity with bandaging alone. Of the 25 children whose treatment began between the first and third months of life, only 48% achieved correction with bandaging alone. In addition, all 13 children whose treatment began after the third month of life needed splints and corrective bandaging.

The AUC is equivalent to the probability that if we were to choose 2 children at random, one who needed a splint and the other not, the test would classify them correctly. Therefore, the AUC estimates the capacity to differentiate whether a splint is needed in the future. The diagnostic test would have more capacity for discrimination the greater the AUC. In our study, we obtained an AUC of 0.921 (95% CI=0.855, 0.987), and because 0.500 is not included in the confidence interval, we can interpret that the test provides positive information on the diagnosis. The cutoff obtained was 27.50 or greater, and the prediction of whether a splint is required, according to the age at which the child commenced treatment with bandages, using data from this cutoff point, is shown in Table 3.

These results confirm the importance of the early diagnosis and treatment of MA. Although most published studies indeed advocate early treatment of MA and recommend starting treatment within the first year of life, they do not comprehensively analyze the potential differences that may exist within this time period.5 Some previous studies did not find any statistically significant relationship between the patient's age and the treatment outcome.9,17 This finding contrasts with the present results, which showed a clear relationship between the age at the start of the treatment and the type and duration of treatment required for final correction.

One limitation of the present study is that it was only feasible to analyze the corrective bandaging method over the short term and medium term, as the patient follow-up time was 2 years. We believe that it would be appropriate for future research to analyze the corrective bandaging method in the long term, particularly at the end of the child's growth period.

In summary, the corrective bandaging method studied in the present work achieved a complete correction in 68.1% (64/94) of patients with MA. The other 31.9% (30/94) of patients needed the application of a posterior splint. All corrections were maintained to at least the 2-year follow-up. The bandaging treatment corrected the deformity more frequently in girls than in boys (78.4% of the girls and 55.8% of the boys did not need splints). The age at the start of the bandaging treatment influenced the likelihood of success in these cases of grade 2 MA. Of the 56 children who began treatment within the first month of life, 92.8% achieved correction of the foot deformity with the corrective bandaging alone.

Appendix.

Appendix.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Appendix.

Experimental Power Calculation

Footnotes

  • Mrs Utrilla-Rodríguez, Professor Albornoz-Cabello, and Mrs Guerrero-Martínez-Cañavete provided concept/idea/research design. Mrs Utrilla-Rodríguez and Dr Munuera-Martínez provided writing. Mrs Utrilla-Rodríguez provided data collection. Professor Albornoz-Cabello and Dr Munuera-Martínez provided data analysis and consultation (including review of manuscript before submission). Professor Albornoz-Cabello provided project management and institutional liaisons.

  • This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Virgen Macarena University Hospital.

  • Received October 14, 2014.
  • Accepted June 8, 2015.
  • © 2016 American Physical Therapy Association

References

  1. ↵
    1. Jackson JF,
    2. Stricker SJ
    . Pediatric foot notes: a review of common congenital foot deformities. Int Pediatr. 2003;18:133–140.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Sankar WN,
    2. Weiss J,
    3. Skaggs DL
    . Orthopaedic conditions in the newborn. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009;17:112–122.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Dawoodi AIS,
    2. Perera A
    . Radiological assessment of metatarsus adductus. Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;18:1–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Ponseti IV,
    2. Becker JR
    . Congenital metatarsus adductus: the results of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1966;48:702–711.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Farsetti P,
    2. Weinstein SL,
    3. Ponseti IV
    . The long-term functional and radiographic outcomes of untreated and non-operatively treated metatarsus adductus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:257–265.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Redmond AC
    . The effectiveness of gait plates in controlling in-toeing symptoms in young children. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2000;90:70–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Peabody CW,
    2. Muro F
    . Congenital metatarsus varus. J Bone Joint Surg. 1933;15:171–189.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Kite JH
    . Congenital metatarsus varus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967;49:388–397.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Martos-Mora C,
    2. Gentil-Fernández J,
    3. Conejero-Casares JA,
    4. Ramos-Moreno R
    . Congenital metatarsus adductus: a clinical classification and therapeutic attitude. Rehabilitación. 2012;46:127–134.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Wan SC
    . Metatarsus adductus and skewfoot deformity. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2006;23:23–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Hutchinson B
    . Pediatric metatarsus adductus and skewfoot deformity. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2010;27:93–104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Williams CM,
    2. James AM,
    3. Tran T
    . Metatarsus adductus: development of a non-surgical treatment pathway. J Paediatr Child Health. 2013;49:E428–E433.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Sirbu AB,
    2. Collof B
    . Early treatment of metatarsus varus (adductus). Pediatrics. 1949;4:810–819, illust.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Reimann I,
    2. Werner HH
    . Congenital metatarsus varus: on the advantages of early treatment. Acta Orthop Scand. 1975;46:857–863.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Sorensen MD,
    2. Hyer CF
    . Metatarsus primus varus correction: the osteotomies. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2009;26:409–425.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Bohne W
    . Metatarsus adductus. Bull N Acad Med. 1987;63:835–838.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Katz K,
    2. David R,
    3. Soudry M
    . Below-knee plaster cast for the treatment of metatarsus adductus. J Pediatr Orthop. 1999;19:49–50.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Ferrari J,
    2. Malone-Lee J
    . A radiographic study of the relationship between metatarsus adductus and hallux valgus. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2003;42:9–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Iglesias MEL,
    2. Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo R,
    3. Crespo AS,
    4. Fuentes PS
    . Poor sitting posture and metatarsus adductus deformity. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2009;99:174–177.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Votta JJ,
    2. Weber RB
    . A nonsurgical treatment regimen for metatarsus adductus utilizing orthoses. J Am Podiatry Assoc. 1981;71:69–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Chong A
    . A new device for the treatment of metatarsus adductus. J Prosthet Orthot. 1990;2:139–148.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Herzenberg JE,
    2. Burghardt RD
    . Resistant metatarsus adductus: prospective randomized trial of casting versus orthosis. J Orthop Sci. 2014;19:250–256.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Mitchell G
    . Abductor hallucis release in congenital metatarsus varus. Int Orthop. 1980;3:299–304.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Ghali NN,
    2. Abberton MJ,
    3. Silk FF
    . The management of metatarsus adductus et supinatus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66:376–380.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Knörr J,
    2. Soldado F,
    3. Pham TT,
    4. et al
    . Percutaneous correction of persistent severe metatarsus adductus in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34:447–452.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 96 Issue 1 Table of Contents
Physical Therapy: 96 (1)

Issue highlights

  • Manual Therapy and Therapeutic Exercise for Temporomandibular Disorders
  • Enablers and Barriers to Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Care
  • Objective Measures of Physical Activity in Youth With Cerebral Palsy
  • Aligning Documentation With Congenital Muscular Torticollis Clinical Practice Guidelines
  • Policy-Making Theory and Analytical Framework in Policy Analysis
  • Quality Indicators in Physical Therapist Practice
  • Therapy in Skilled Nursing Facilities for Patients With Hip Fracture
  • Workforce Projections 2010舑2020
  • Physical Function and 30-Day Readmission
  • Evidence-Based Approach to Rotator Cuff Rehabilitation
  • Corrective Bandage for Metatarsus Adductus
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on JCORE Reference.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Corrective Bandage for Conservative Treatment of Metatarsus Adductus: Retrospective Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from JCORE Reference
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the JCORE Reference web site.
Print
Corrective Bandage for Conservative Treatment of Metatarsus Adductus: Retrospective Study
Elia Utrilla-Rodríguez, María Jesús Guerrero-Martínez-Cañavete, Manuel Albornoz-Cabello, Pedro V. Munuera-Martínez
Physical Therapy Jan 2016, 96 (1) 46-52; DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20140443

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Download Powerpoint
Save to my folders

Share
Corrective Bandage for Conservative Treatment of Metatarsus Adductus: Retrospective Study
Elia Utrilla-Rodríguez, María Jesús Guerrero-Martínez-Cañavete, Manuel Albornoz-Cabello, Pedro V. Munuera-Martínez
Physical Therapy Jan 2016, 96 (1) 46-52; DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20140443
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Appendix.
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Reliability and Validity of Force Platform Measures of Balance Impairment in Individuals With Parkinson Disease
  • Predictors of Reduced Frequency of Physical Activity 3 Months After Injury: Findings From the Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study
  • Effects of Locomotor Exercise Intensity on Gait Performance in Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
Show more Research Reports

Subjects

  • Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics: Other
  • Musculoskeletal System/Orthopedic
    • Injuries and Conditions: Foot
  • Intervention
    • Patient/Client-Related Instruction
    • Adaptive/Assistive Devices

Footer Menu 1

  • menu 1 item 1
  • menu 1 item 2
  • menu 1 item 3
  • menu 1 item 4

Footer Menu 2

  • menu 2 item 1
  • menu 2 item 2
  • menu 2 item 3
  • menu 2 item 4

Footer Menu 3

  • menu 3 item 1
  • menu 3 item 2
  • menu 3 item 3
  • menu 3 item 4

Footer Menu 4

  • menu 4 item 1
  • menu 4 item 2
  • menu 4 item 3
  • menu 4 item 4
footer second
footer first
Copyright © 2013 The HighWire JCore Reference Site | Print ISSN: 0123-4567 | Online ISSN: 1123-4567
advertisement bottom
Advertisement Top