Skip to main content
  • Other Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
Advertisement
JCORE Reference
this is the JCORE Reference site slogan
  • Home
  • Most Read
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Patients
  • Reference Site Links
    • View Regions
  • Archive

Minority Applicants to Physical Therapist Education Programs 2010–2012

Matthew A. Nuciforo
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20130585 Published 1 January 2015
Matthew A. Nuciforo
M.A. Nuciforo, PT, DPT, OCS, FAAOMPT, Department of Physical Therapy, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, 3333 Green Bay Rd, North Chicago, IL 60064 (USA).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background In 2011–2012, despite comprising 35% of the US population, minorities comprised 20% of applicants to and 15% of enrolled students in accredited physical therapist education programs. Solutions aimed at addressing current disparities in health care may include educating physical therapists in environments reflecting the increasing diversity of the US population.

Objective The purposes of this study were: (1) to describe the underrepresented minority (URM) applicant pool to Physical Therapist Centralized Application Service (PTCAS) member programs and (2) to investigate differences in application patterns between white and URM applicants in 2010–2012, including total number of programs to which they applied, likelihood of applying out of state, and application to programs with minority faculties.

Design This was a national, retrospective descriptive study.

Methods De-identified data for 11,690 applicants in 2010–2011 and 13,462 applicants in 2011–2012 were obtained, including applicant demographics, selected metrics, and admission decisions. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance with multiple comparison procedures (Tukey honestly significant difference test) were used to investigate differences between white and URM applicant metrics and application patterns.

Results White applicants achieved significantly greater grade point average and Graduate Record Examination scores than Hispanic and African American applicants. Although there were no significant differences in the average number of programs applied to between white and URM applicants, Hispanic applicants were significantly more likely to apply to programs within their state of residence. Underrepresented minority applicants were significantly more likely to apply to programs with minority faculties.

Limitations This study did not attempt to generalize the results beyond PTCAS institutions.

Conclusions Hispanic applicants demonstrated a significantly increased likelihood of applying within their state of residence. Underrepresented minority applicants demonstrated a significantly greater tendency to apply to PTCAS member institutions with minority faculties.

According to 2010 US census data, the racial/ethnic minority population has grown substantially over the last decade. The greatest growth occurred among the Asian and Hispanic populations, each over 40%. In 2010, Asians comprised 4.8% and Hispanics 16.3% of the total US population. The African American population grew 12.3% to comprise 12.6% of the total population. Overshadowed by the growth of minority populations, the white population sustained a meager 5.7% growth in 2000–2010.1 Despite currently comprising 72.4% of the total US population, by 2045, non-Hispanic whites are projected to no longer constitute a majority of the population.2

In contrast to the increasing diversity of the US population, minorities remain underrepresented in the physical therapy profession. According to US census data from 2006–2010, 80.9% of all physical therapists were white. Only 4.5% self-identified as Hispanic, 3.9% as African American, 9.4% as Asian and less than 1% as American Indian, Alaskan, or Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander.3 Among members of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) as of 2010, only 2.1% of physical therapists were Hispanic, 4.7% Asian, 1.4% African American, and less than 1% American Indian, Alaskan Native, or Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander.4

In response to health care inequities and disparities, APTA's Vision Statement for the Physical Therapy Profession5 and Guiding Principles to Achieve the Vision6 support increased enrollment of physical therapists from underrepresented racial and ethnic minority groups. Although total enrollment within physical therapist education programs has increased approximately 55% since 2003, white student enrollment has maintained a steady majority of around 80%. Also, although the US Hispanic and African American populations have grown by 43% and 12.3%, respectively, in the last decade, Hispanic and African American enrollment declined by nearly 17% and 30%, respectively, from 2004 to 2011.7 In 2011–2012, minorities comprised a meager 15% of enrolled students in accredited physical therapist education programs. Hispanic enrollment (4%) and African American enrollment (3.4%) were appreciably underrepresented compared with the general population.7 The decline of minority enrollment of these races in particular will only contribute to an already disproportionate representation within the profession.

The Need for Diversity

Although there is a paucity of evidence addressing the benefits of diversity in physical therapy, analogies may be drawn from medicine. The recent Institute of Medicine (IOM) report Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care8 cited substantial evidence that minorities are less likely than whites to receive needed services, including clinically necessary procedures, even after correcting for access-related factors, such as insurance status. Although the reasons for this disparity are likely multifactorial, the underrepresentation of minorities in medicine and health care presents a clear challenge to public health. While a direct link between a more diverse health care workforce and improved patient outcomes has not been fully revealed, a strong framework in support of diversity within medicine has been established. A recent review by Saha and Shipman9 demonstrated minority physicians were more likely than whites to serve individuals from their own racial backgrounds and to provide care to underserved populations. Moreover, African American and Hispanic physicians are disproportionately more likely to provide care for patients receiving Medicaid and uninsured patients than white or Asian physicians.10 Patient-provider racial and ethnic concordance among minorities also has been shown to positively influence use of health care services and patients' view of the quality of those services.9 Although the focus of research has been on the physician workforce, it may be surmised that the impact of increased minority representation may likewise apply to other professions, including physical therapy.

Emphasizing diversity and providing all students, including nonminority students, with curricular and extracurricular opportunities to address racial and multicultural issues have been previously associated with widespread beneficial effects on student cognitive and affective development.10–12 White medical students educated in schools with a more racially diverse student population were more likely to rate themselves as highly prepared to care for minority populations and expressed more positive attitudes about equitable access to care than those in less diverse schools.11 Medical students also have reported that a diverse educational environment enhanced classroom discussions, challenged values when racial conflicts occurred, and prepared them to work more effectively with diverse patients.12 Addressing the underrepresentation of minorities in many health care professions, including physical therapy, and implementing planned diverse educational experiences may affect the disparity of health care delivery, as cited in the IOM report.

Diversity in the Health Professions and Physical Therapist Education Programs

Given the disparity in health care delivery, the increasing diversity of the US population, and the benefits of diverse educational experiences, there is a clear need for increased representation of minorities among health professional students. The underrepresentation of minority students is not limited to physical therapy but is reflective of similar challenges facing other health professions. White applicants comprised 61.9% of all applicants to US medical schools in 2012. Hispanic applicants composed a mere 8.2%, and African American applicants composed 8.4%.13 Among applicants to US physician assistant programs in 2011–2012, 65.6% were white, far surpassing the numbers of Hispanic (8.4%) and African American (3.0%) applicants.14 Whites comprised 82% of all students enrolled in master's-level occupational therapy programs in 201115 and 84% of students enrolled in master's programs in speech and language pathology.16 Similarly, among students enrolled in bachelor of nursing programs, 72% were white.17

According to the Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education (CAPTE), enrollment of white students remained essentially unchanged from 2003–2004 (80.9%) to 2011–2012 (81.3%).7 Despite this finding, the profession has experienced meager growth in minority applications to education programs. In a 2000 national study of physical therapy applicants, Goldstein and Gandy18 identified 83.3% of the applicant pool as white, not of Hispanic origin. In 2010–2011, white applicants comprised 66.74% of all applicants to Physical Therapist Centralized Application Service (PTCAS) member programs.19 Although a portion of this shift in race can be accounted for by applicants who declined to state ethnicity, an option not available in 2000, the Hispanic, African-American, and American Indian/Alaskan Native groups together grew from 7.5% in 200018 to 11.5% 2012.20 Collectively, all minority groups comprised 20.9% of the total applicant pool to PTCAS institutions in 2011–2012.20 Table 1 shows the percentages of applicants and matriculants in 2010–2011 and 2011–2012 compared with 2000.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Percent of Total Applications to Physical Therapist Centralized Application Service (PTCAS) Member Programs in 2010–2012 by Race/Ethnicity Designation

Factors Affecting Minority Applicant Patterns to Physical Therapist Education Programs

Although several studies have described various minority recruitment strategies in physical therapy, few have sought to describe actual minority application patterns and address possible reasons for minority underrepresentation relative to the general population. Factors influencing physical therapist program choice have been shown to differ between underrepresented minority (URM) and white applicants and matriculants. Program cost and financial considerations,21–24 presence of minority faculty,22,25 and student diversity22,24 have all been shown to influence minority applicant decisions. In a survey of first-year physical therapist students, URM students were more likely than white students to consider cost in selecting a physical therapist education program.22 In a similar study of students at 10 physical therapist programs, Johanson23 found a significantly higher percentage of URM applicants identified availability of financial aid as an important or deciding factor in program choice (P<.003). Among African American students, 84.2% identified availability of financial aid as an important and deciding factor compared with 62.3% of whites studied. Financial issues also have been identified by URM students as one of the largest nonacademic challenges faced during program completion.24

Prior research also indicates that URM students value faculty diversity (P<.001) in program selection.22 In a study of 76 physical therapist education programs, Splenser et al25 identified a significant correlation between full-time minority faculty and minority applicants (r=.426, P<.01). However, this association did not translate to a significant correlation between minority faculty and first-year students or graduates (r=.173, r=.219). In contrast, Gabard et al26 found that although a lack of ethnic diversity within physical therapy faculty was identified by URM students, it was not a deterrent in pursuit of physical therapy as a career. Despite this evidence, no research examining minority application patterns to doctoral programs has been conducted utilizing a large national sample.

Addressing diversity within the profession of physical therapy through increasing URM representation is but one potential solution addressing current disparities in health care delivery. A greater understanding of patterns of application to physical therapist programs may provide a foundation upon which strategies to advance diversity may be rooted. The purposes of this study were: (1) to describe the URM applicant pool to PTCAS member programs and (2) to investigate differences in application patterns between white and URM applicants in 2010–2012, including total number of programs to which applied, likelihood of applying out of state, and application to programs with minority faculty.

Method

Participants

Following execution of a data use agreement with APTA, de-identified applicant data from 2010–2012 were provided by Liaison International (Watertown, Massachusetts), developer and manager of PTCAS. The sample consisted 11,690 applicants to 128 member institutions in 2010–2011 (PTCAS11) and 13,462 applicants to 146 member institutions in 2011–2012 (PTCAS12). An applicant was defined as a prospective student who completed all PTCAS requirements in submitting a verified application to at least one PTCAS member institution. Based on annual accreditation report data provided by CAPTE, physical therapist programs with at least one full-time or part-time minority core faculty were identified.

The Association of American Medical Colleges' (AAMC) definition of underrepresented in medicine was applied to identify URM applicants to physical therapist programs. In 2003, the AAMC modified its definition to include all racial and ethnic populations that are underrepresented in the medical profession relative to the general population.27 In accordance with this definition, Hispanic/Latino, African-American, American Indian/Alaskan Native, and Hawaiian/Pacific Islander applicants were considered to be underrepresented in physical therapy based on census data. Asians remain overrepresented relative to US population (4.8%)3 among applicants (PTCAS11=7.65%, PTCAS12=8.27%),19,20 accepted applicants (PTCAS11=6.82%, PTCAS12=6.9%),19,20 and practicing physical therapists (9.4%).3 According to PTCAS procedure and in compliance with US Department of Education reporting requirements, applicants could select one or more racial or ethnic categories. Race and Hispanic origin are separate concepts; thus, the “Hispanic/Latino” category was a separate field within the PTCAS application. Applicants with multiple minority racial categories selected were categorized as “2+ Race/Ethnicity Designations” for this study.

Data Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize sample metric characteristics, including science and cumulative grade point averages (SGPA and CGPA, respectively) and quantitative, verbal, and analytical Graduate Record Examination (QGRE, VGRE, and AGRE, respectively) scores for all applicants in both PTCAS11 and PTCAS12. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess differences in metrics between URM and white applicants. Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc testing was performed to compare all possible pairs of means between white applicants and each minority applicant group. Prior research identifying variables predictive of success in physical therapist education programs28,29 and on the National Physical Therapy Examination30,31 were utilized to guide the selection of metric variables. Furthermore, we sought to extract the data most readily available from PTCAS and available to the majority of PTCAS institutions. The PTCAS computes several standardized grade point average (GPA) calculations to assist participating programs in evaluating applicants using uniform and consistent criteria, regardless of different undergraduate institutional transcript policies. In accordance with PTCAS GPA calculation procedure, all grades (including repeated classes) are entered into the GPA calculation. The SGPA calculation includes anatomy and physiology, biology, chemistry, and physics course work. Math, movement science, social/behavioral science, and other science courses were excluded from all SGPA calculations. The CGPA calculations included all undergraduate, graduate, and professional courses completed.32 In the instance of multiple Graduate Record Examination (GRE) scores, the highest score for each subtest was utilized as the independent variable. To maintain consistency in GRE score reports, revised GRE scores using the new scoring system were recoded to the old system using Educational Testing Service concordance tables.

Differences in number of total applications submitted among URM and white applicants were assessed using ANOVA. In post hoc testing, each racial/ethnic group included in the URM definition was compared with white applicants using the Tukey HSD test. Similarly, differences in application patterns between white and URM applicants relative to number of applications to in-state versus out-of-state programs and to programs with and without minority faculty were studied. Analysis of variance was first used to assess for differences between whites and URM applicants as a group, with post hoc Tukey HSD testing utilized to identify differences between white applicants and each minority group. Based on the initial results, a secondary analysis was performed on Hispanic in-state applicants to assess for differences in rates of application to public and private institutions. Statistical analyses were performed with Statistical Package for the Social Science software (IBM SPSS 19.0, IBM, Armonk, New York). A P value of ≤.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Descriptive statistics of applicant metrics for individual URM groups compared with white applicants are summarized in Table 2. In PTCAS11 and PTCAS12, non-Hispanic whites achieved significantly higher GPA and GRE scores than African American and Hispanic/Latino applicants (P<.05). With the exception of American Indian/Alaskan Native applicants, SGPA and CGPA rose for all applicant groups from PTCAS11 to PTCAS12. Although not consistent across all groups, increases in GRE subscale scores also were noted between the 2 cycles.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

Descriptive Statistics–Applicant Metricsa

In PTCAS11, URM applicants as a group applied to an average of 4.73 programs, minimally less than the average of 4.81 programs for non-Hispanic white applicants (P=.878). Both white and URM applicants applied, on average, to a greater number of programs in PTCAS12 (5.29 and 5.31, respectively) but again without significant between-group differences (P=.997). Results of ANOVA with multiple comparison procedures for each applicant group are displayed in Table 3. Among all applicant groups, Asians applied to the greatest number of programs in both application cycles. Asian applicants, applicants of 2 or more races/ethnicities, and applicants who declined to state race or ethnicity applied to a significantly greater number of programs in 2010–2012 compared with white applicants (P≤.001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3.

One-Way Analysis of Variance for Total Applications, by Cyclea

Although there were no significant differences between white and Hispanic applicants in total number of programs to which they applied, Hispanic applicants demonstrated a significantly increased likelihood of applying within their state of residence and a correspondingly decreased likelihood of applying out of state in both PTCAS11 and PTCAS12 cycles (P<.05). The average numbers of in-state and out-of-state programs applied to by white and URM applicant groups are displayed in Table 4. Consistent with an increased total application rate, Asians applied to significantly more in-state and out-of-state programs than white applicants in both application cycles (P<.001). Secondary analysis of Hispanic applicants to in-state programs revealed a significantly increased likelihood of applying to private as opposed to public institutions (P<.001). The numbers of private and public in-state programs applied to by Hispanic applicants are displayed in Table 5.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 4.

In-State Versus Out-of-State Applications, by Cyclea

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 5.

Hispanic/Latino In-State Applicationsa

In both PTCAS11 and PTCAS12, URM applicants as a group were significantly more likely to apply to PTCAS member institutions with minority faculty than white applicants (PTCAS11: URM=3.20, white=2.80, P<.001; PTCAS12: URM=3.42, white=2.94, P<.001). Based on program data provided by CAPTE, 115 programs were identified as possessing at least one full-time or part-time minority core faculty (X̅=2.14, SD=1.47). Results of ANOVA with multiple comparison procedures for each applicant race in PTCAS11 and PTCAS12 are displayed in Table 6. Hispanic and African American applicants were significantly more likely than white applicants to apply to programs with minority faculty and correspondingly less likely to apply to programs without minority faculty (P<.05). A similar pattern was observed among American Indian/Alaskan Native and Hawaiian/Pacific Islander applicants in combined data from 2010–2012, but this relationship failed to reach statistical significance.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 6.

Applications to Programs With Minority Faculty, by Cyclea

Discussion

This study revealed significant differences in applicant metrics and application patterns among white and URM applicants to PTCAS member programs in 2010–2012. With a few exceptions, URM applicant groups reported lower average GPA and GRE scores than white applicants. These findings are consistent with prior studies of the academic metric profiles of URM applicants in other professions. Medium to large standardized mean differences in undergraduate GPA (0.5–0.9) have been demonstrated between African American and Hispanic applicants in comparison with white medical school applicants.33 African American and Hispanic medical school applicants achieved lower average Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) scores in 2009 compared with white applicants. However, in refute of test bias, URM and white groups have achieved academic success at rates equal to those predicted by MCAT scores.33

Lower metric profiles may disadvantage URM applicants. In a 2008 study of US and Canadian medical schools, standardized test scores and undergraduate GPAs were rated as the most important factors for deciding who to invite to submit secondary applications and interview.34 Among applicants to physical therapist programs in 2008–2011, SGPA was the greatest predictor of successful admission to PTCAS member programs.35 It is important to note that this analysis identified average scores among applicant groups and does not suggest uniformly high or low intellectual capability as evidenced by GPA and GRE scores for all applicants in various racial groups. A high level of variability is generally acknowledged within each group. Furthermore, statistically significant differences may not equate to academically meaningful determinants of success within physical therapist programs. Despite the inherent variability, admissions policies with sole regard for GPA and standardized test measures may disadvantage URM applicants. These results may provide further evidence supporting a broader review of applicant qualifications. The AAMC, for example, supports balancing applicant metrics with experiences and attributes through holistic review. Experiences may include educational background, employment history, research experience, or experience in a health care setting. Applicant attributes include such abilities as oral communication, critical thinking, integrity, motivation, intellectual curiosity, and empathy. Using this framework, applicants are evaluated by criteria that are institutional specific and mission-driven. Diversity, as defined by the AAMC, is a student-specific, multifaceted concept that extends beyond race and ethnicity.36

Increases in applicant metrics across nearly all applicant ethnic groups, combined with an increase in total applicants from PTCAS11 to PTCAS12, provide evidence of increasing competition for admission to physical therapist education programs. As a result, programs may consider academic enrichment or related pipeline programs to boost profiles of URM applicants. Such programs beginning as early as the secondary level may serve to generate increased awareness of physical therapy as a career choice and prepare future applicants for academic success. Prior research has provided evidence of positive outcomes associated with racial/ethnic minority and disadvantaged students' participation in structured pipeline programs.37,38 Intensive premedical enrichment programs have been shown to increase the chances of medical school acceptance among minority applicants even after controlling for grades, standardized test scores, and other variables.38 Programs in medicine and those currently in existence in physical therapy may serve as examples for increasing URM applications to all physical therapist education programs.

Although overall application rates did not differ significantly between white and Hispanic applicants, Hispanic applicants demonstrated a greater likelihood of applying to in-state versus out-of-state programs. This finding is consistent with prior research on undergraduate program choice and perhaps illustrates the importance of familism in the Hispanic culture. Desmond and López Turley39 defined familism as a social pattern in which individual interests, decisions, and actions are conditioned by family, which takes precedence over the individual. Hispanic adults and adolescents have been shown to value interdependence and family obligations and thus may desire to enroll in a program in proximity to home, upholding family ties that shape their identity. Compared with other ethnicities, Hispanic high school seniors are more likely than other racial/ethnic groups to value living at home while attending college.39 With this finding in mind, physical therapist education programs may find it most beneficial to target recruitment and career exploration to Hispanic applicants within their local area.

In addition to familism, it is possible that Hispanic applicants were influenced by financial considerations. This study provided interesting results related to the impact of financial considerations on the increased likelihood of applying to in-state programs among Hispanic applicants. Although it is difficult to demonstrate a direct relationship between program cost and application rates, the increased likelihood of applying to in-state private as opposed to public institutions was not consistent with prior research21–24 when known differences in average tuition rates were considered. According to CAPTE data, the average tuition at a private institution was more than twice that of public institutions in 2011–2012.7 Other factors beyond tuition, such as increased availability of financial support at private institutions, or additional nonfinancial factors, such as increased student body diversity, which could not be measured in this study, also may have influenced these results.

Although the findings did not consistently reach significance among all URM applicant groups, this study does provide evidence as to the importance of minority faculty in URM student recruitment. Unfortunately, the overall disparity of URM applicants to physical therapist education programs is paralleled by a lack of racial and ethnic diversity among program faculty. In 2011–2012, African American and Hispanic faculty combined composed slightly more than 5% of all core faculty at CAPTE-accredited programs. Furthermore, more than 40% of all programs lacked URM faculty.7 The importance of a diverse faculty has been cited by medical students as a strong contributor to the overall impact of diversity on educational experiences.40 Based on our study, enhancing URM applications appear to be associated with the need to further enhance faculty diversity. It also is possible that the increased rate of application to programs with minority faculty demonstrated in this study is a consequence of regional demographic differences in the general population rather than representing an intentional decision of minority applicants. Underrepresented minority applicants may apply to certain geographical areas or programs for many reasons, such as a desire to stay close to home. Programs in the applicant's local area may happen to also have a greater representation of minority faculty. Nonetheless, physical therapist education programs may consider striving to create an environment attractive to both the increased recruitment and retention of URM students and faculty.

Limitations

Because this research focused on PTCAS application data, this study did not attempt to generalize the results beyond PTCAS institutions. However, the PTCAS applicant database provided the best available data reflective of the national pool of applicants to physical therapist education programs in 2010–2012. Approximately 70% of all accredited programs were PTCAS members in 2011–2012. In comparing applicant metrics, one must recognize variation in admissions processes and requirements across physical therapist education programs. The GRE is not required by all PTCAS member programs and thus is not a uniform variable. Moreover, in 2010–2011, GRE scores were self-reported by the applicant and not verified by PTCAS. The impact of applicants who decline to state racial or ethnic status also may have a profound impact on future conversations of admissions and diversity. Approximately 13% of applicants declined to report racial or ethnic status to PTCAS in 2010–2012. Other professions have speculated that this group may comprise white and mixed race applicants and applicants who simply are uncomfortable talking about race.41 Although the true composition and reasoning behind nonreporting are unknown, this group could have affected the findings of this study. Future research identifying possible reasons for declining to state racial and ethnic status and the degree to which these applicants willingly contribute to conversations related to diversity in the classroom may serve the profession. The impact of financial considerations such as differences in financial aid availability at public and private institutions and student minority representation within programs also would contribute to a more thorough understanding of URM application patterns.

Unlike medicine, the extent to which a diverse physical therapist workforce addresses disparities in access to quality care experienced by underserved populations is not well established in the literature. Future research should identify the degree to which the same conclusions can be drawn in physical therapy. Furthermore, this study investigated one aspect of applicant diversity: race and ethnicity. Addressing the current health care needs of our society and improving diversity within our profession extend well beyond racial or ethnic origin. In a broad sense, diversity is a multifaceted concept encompassing demographics, personal characteristics, abilities, and experiences. The profession would benefit from further research investigating additional factors affecting diversity beyond race and identifying the presence of differing attributes and noncognitive variables between URM and white applicants. Further qualitative evaluation of recruitment and retention policies at those programs that matriculate and graduate the greatest number of URM applicants also may guide the profession toward closing the disparity gap.

In conclusion, today's physical therapists pose little resemblance to the diverse population they serve. Together, Hispanic/Latino, African American, American Indian/Alaskan Native, and Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders comprise 30% of the total US population1 but only 9.1% of the US physical therapist population3 and only about 12% of applicants to PTCAS member programs. Even less resemblance will result in future years if our profession fails to address the current disparity. This study examined the metric profiles and application patterns of white and URM applicants to PTCAS member institutions in 2010–2012. The results of this study indicate that non-Hispanic whites achieved significantly higher GPA and GRE scores than African American and Hispanic/Latino applicants. Furthermore, URM applicants demonstrated a significantly greater tendency to apply to PTCAS member institutions with minority faculty, and Hispanic applicants demonstrated a significantly increased likelihood of applying within their state of residence. In accordance with the IOM's recommendation to increase the number of health professionals as a key component in the elimination of health disparities, the physical therapy profession may use this data to guide future URM recruitment efforts.

Footnotes

  • The author thanks Libby Ross, Director, Academic Program Services, American Physical Therapy Association, for her consulting and assistance in securing accurate de-identified data from Liaison International. The author also appreciates the assistance of colleagues Dr Wendy Rheault and Dr Judith Stoecker for their assistance and support throughout this project.

  • The research proposal was approved by the Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science Institutional Review Board.

  • A portion of the data from the manuscript was given as a poster presentation at the Combined Sections Meeting of the American Physical Therapy Association; February 4–7, 2014; Las Vegas, Nevada.

  • Received November 25, 2013.
  • Accepted August 24, 2014.
  • © 2015 American Physical Therapy Association

References

  1. ↵
    Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010. 2010 Census Briefs. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2011. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-02.pdf. Accessed July 2013.
  2. ↵
    2012 National Population Projections. US Census Data Tables. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2012. Available at: http://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2012/summarytables.html. Accessed July 2013.
  3. ↵
    US Census Bureau. FactFinder Detailed Census Occupation by Sex and Race/Ethnicity for Residence Geography Universe: Civilian Labor Force 16 Years and Over. Available at: http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=EEO_10_5YR_EEOALL1R&prodType=table. Accessed July 2013.
  4. ↵
    American Physical Therapy Association. Physical Therapist Member Demographic Profile, 2011. Available at: http://www.apta.org/WorkforceData/. Accessed July 2013.
  5. ↵
    American Physical Therapy Association. Vision Statement for the Physical Therapy Profession. 2013. Available at: http://www.apta.org/Vision/.
  6. ↵
    American Physical Therapy Association. Guiding Principles to Achieve the Vision. 2013. Available at: http://www.apta.org/Vision/.
  7. ↵
    Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education. 2011–2012 Fact Sheet Physical Therapy Education Programs. Available at: http://www.capteonline.org/uploadedFiles/CAPTEorg/About_CAPTE/Resources/Aggregate_Program_Data/AggregateProgramData_PTPrograms.pdf. Accessed July 2013.
  8. ↵
    Institute of Medicine. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2003.
  9. ↵
    1. Saha S,
    2. Shipman S
    . The Rationale for Diversity in the Health Professions: A Review of the Evidence. 2006. Rockville, MD: Health Resources and Services Administration. Available at: http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/reports/diversityreviewevidence.pdf. Accessed June 2013
  10. ↵
    1. Ashton AW
    . How are students affected? Change. 1993;23:44.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Saha S,
    2. Guiton G,
    3. Wimmers PF,
    4. Wilkerson L
    . Student body racial and ethnic composition and diversity-related outcomes in US medical schools. JAMA. 2008;300:1135–1145.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Xu G,
    2. Fields SK,
    3. Laine C,
    4. et al
    . The relationship between the race/ethnicity of generalist physicians and their care for the underserved. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:817–822.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    Association of American Medical Colleges. Applicants and Matriculants Data. Table 13: Race and Ethnicity Responses of Applicants to US Medical Schools. 2003–2012. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/download/321484/data/2012factstable13.pdf. Accessed September 2014.
  14. ↵
    Physician Assistant Education Association. CASPA Cycle 11 Report, 2012. Available at: http://www.paeaonline.org/index.php?ht=a/GetDocumentAction/i/144686. Accessed July 2013.
  15. ↵
    American Occupational Therapy Association. Academic Programs Annual Data Report, 2012. Available at: http://www.aota.org/-/media/Corporate/Files/EducationCareers/Educators/OTEdData/Annual%20Data%20Report%202011-2012.pdf. Accessed June 2013.
  16. ↵
    Council of Academic Programs in Communication Sciences and Disorders and American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2011. HES CSD Education Survey National Aggregate Data Report: 2010–2011 Academic Year. Available at: http://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/2010-2011-CSD-Aggregate-Data-Report.pdf. Accessed May 2013.
  17. ↵
    American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. Race/Ethnicity of Students Enrolled in Generic (Entry-Level) Baccalaureate, Master's, and Doctoral (Research-Focused) Programs in Nursing, 2002–2011. Available at: http://www.aacn.nche.edu/research-data/ethnicityTbl.pdf. Accessed July 2013.
  18. ↵
    1. Goldstein M,
    2. Gandy J
    . Applicants to professional physical therapist programs in 2000. J Phys Ther Educ. 2001;15:9–15.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    Physical Therapist Centralized Application Service 2010–2011 Applicant Data Report, October 2011. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 2011.
  20. ↵
    Physical Therapist Centralized Application Service 2011–2012 Applicant Data Report, October 2012. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 2012.
  21. ↵
    1. Gabard DL,
    2. Baumeister-Parikh M,
    3. Takahashi R,
    4. et al
    . Barriers to non-white potential students in physical therapy. J Phys Ther Educ. 1997;11:38–45.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Curbow Wilcox K,
    2. Weber M,
    3. Andrew D
    . Factors influencing minority students' choice of physical therapist education programs. J Phys Ther Educ. 2005;19:8–14.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Johanson MA
    . Factors influencing students' selection of physical therapy programs: difference between men and women and racial/ethnic groups. J Phys Ther Educ. 2007;21:22–32.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Moore V,
    2. Beitman L,
    3. Rajan S,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of recruitment, selection, and retention factors: students from under-represented and predominantly represented backgrounds seeking careers in physical therapy. J Phys Ther Educ. 2003;17:56–66.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Splenser PE,
    2. Canlas HL,
    3. Sanders B,
    4. Melzer B
    . Minority recruitment and retention strategies in physical therapist education programs. J Phys Ther Educ. 2003;17:18–26.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Gabard DL,
    2. Baumeister-Parikh M,
    3. Takahashi R,
    4. et al
    . Barriers to nonwhite potential students of physical therapy. J Phys Ther Educ. 1997;11:38–45.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    Association of American Medical Colleges. Underrepresented in Medicine Definition. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/initiatives/urm/. Accessed May 2013.
  28. ↵
    1. Zipp GP,
    2. Ruscingno G,
    3. Olson V
    . Admission variables and academic success in the first year of the professional phase in a doctor of physical therapy program. J Allied Health. 2010;39:138–142.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Shiyko MP,
    2. Pappas E
    . Validation of pre-admissions requirements in a doctor of physical therapy program with a large representation of minority students. J Phys Ther Educ. 2009;23:29–36.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Hollman JH,
    2. Rindflesch AB,
    3. Youdas JW,
    4. et al
    . Retrospective analysis of the behavioral interview and other preadmission variables to predict licensure examination outcomes in physical therapy. J Allied Health. 2008;37:97–104.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Utzman RR,
    2. Riddle DL,
    3. Jewell DV
    . Use of demographic and quantitative admissions data to predict performance on the National Physical Therapy Examination. Phys Ther. 2007;87:1181–1193.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Physical Therapist Centralized Application Service Program Manual. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 2010.
  33. ↵
    1. Davis D,
    2. Dorsey JK,
    3. Franks RD,
    4. et al
    . Do racial and ethnic group differences in performance on the MCAT exam reflect test bias? Acad Med. 2013;88:593–602.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    1. Monroe A,
    2. Quinn E,
    3. Samuelson W,
    4. et al
    . An overview of the medical school admission process and use of applicant data in decision making: what has changed since the 1980s? Acad Med. 2013;88:672–681.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Nuciforo MA,
    2. Litvinsky Y,
    3. Rheault W
    . Variables predictive of admission to US physical therapist education programs. J Phys Ther Educ. In press.
  36. ↵
    1. Addams AN,
    2. Bletzinger RB,
    3. Sondheimer HM,
    4. et al
    . Roadmap to Diversity: Integrating Holistic Review Practices Into Medical School Admission Processes. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2010.
  37. ↵
    US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Bureau of Health Professions. Pipeline Programs to Improve Racial and Ethnic Diversity in the Health Professions: An Inventory of Federal Programs, Assessment of Evaluation Approaches, and Critical Review of the Research Literature. 2009. Available at: http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/reports/pipelineprogdiversity.pdf. Accessed July 2013.
  38. ↵
    1. Cantor JC,
    2. Bergeisen L,
    3. Baker LC
    . Effect of an intensive educational program for minority college students and recent graduates on the probability of acceptance to medical school. JAMA. 1998;280:772–776.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Desmond M,
    2. López Turley RN
    . The role of familism in explaining the hispanic-white college application gap. Soc Probl. 2009;56:311–334.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Whitla DK,
    2. Orfield G,
    3. Silen W,
    4. et al
    . Educational benefits of diversity in medical school: a survey of students. Acad Med. 2003;78:460–466.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    1. Rich CG
    . Decline to state: diversity talk and the American law student. Review of Law and Social Justice. 2009;18:539–585.
    OpenUrl
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 95 Issue 1 Table of Contents
Physical Therapy: 95 (1)

Issue highlights

  • APTA's Top Five Choosing Wisely Recommendations
  • Play-Based Assessments of Motor and Cognitive Skills for Infants and Young Children
  • Minority Applicants to Physical Therapist Education Programs
  • Impaired Object Exploration Behaviors in Infants Born Preterm
  • Associations of Upper Limb Disability Measures on Different ICF Levels in Multiple Sclerosis
  • TENS Decreases Postoperative Allodynia
  • Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly Questionnaire
  • Dual Tasking With the Timed “Up & Go” in People With Parkinson Disease
  • Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment Wrist/Hand Mobility Scales
  • Massage-Induced Brachial Plexus Injury
  • Manual Therapy and Exercise in Patients With Muscle Tension Dysphonia
  • FAST Protocol
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on JCORE Reference.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Minority Applicants to Physical Therapist Education Programs 2010–2012
(Your Name) has sent you a message from JCORE Reference
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the JCORE Reference web site.
Print
Minority Applicants to Physical Therapist Education Programs 2010–2012
Matthew A. Nuciforo
Physical Therapy Jan 2015, 95 (1) 39-50; DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20130585

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Save to my folders

Share
Minority Applicants to Physical Therapist Education Programs 2010–2012
Matthew A. Nuciforo
Physical Therapy Jan 2015, 95 (1) 39-50; DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20130585
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • The Need for Diversity
    • Diversity in the Health Professions and Physical Therapist Education Programs
    • Factors Affecting Minority Applicant Patterns to Physical Therapist Education Programs
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Reliability and Validity of Force Platform Measures of Balance Impairment in Individuals With Parkinson Disease
  • Predictors of Reduced Frequency of Physical Activity 3 Months After Injury: Findings From the Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study
  • Effects of Locomotor Exercise Intensity on Gait Performance in Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
Show more Research Reports

Subjects

Footer Menu 1

  • menu 1 item 1
  • menu 1 item 2
  • menu 1 item 3
  • menu 1 item 4

Footer Menu 2

  • menu 2 item 1
  • menu 2 item 2
  • menu 2 item 3
  • menu 2 item 4

Footer Menu 3

  • menu 3 item 1
  • menu 3 item 2
  • menu 3 item 3
  • menu 3 item 4

Footer Menu 4

  • menu 4 item 1
  • menu 4 item 2
  • menu 4 item 3
  • menu 4 item 4
footer second
footer first
Copyright © 2013 The HighWire JCore Reference Site | Print ISSN: 0123-4567 | Online ISSN: 1123-4567
advertisement bottom
Advertisement Top