Skip to main content
  • Other Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
Advertisement
JCORE Reference
this is the JCORE Reference site slogan
  • Home
  • Most Read
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Patients
  • Reference Site Links
    • View Regions
  • Archive

On “Quality of life and self-reported lower extremity function…” Galantino ML, Kietrys DM, Parrott JS, et al. Phys Ther. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130337.

Paul W. Stratford, Daniel L. Riddle
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.2014.94.9.1355 Published 1 September 2014
Paul W. Stratford
P.W. Stratford, PT, MSc, School of Rehabilitation Science, Institute for Applied Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel L. Riddle
D.L. Riddle, PT, PhD, FAPTA, Departments of Physical Therapy and Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

[Editor's note: Both the letter to the editor by Stratford and Riddle and the response by Parrott and colleagues are commenting on the author manuscript version of the article that was published ahead of print on May 22, 2014.]

We read with great interest the study by Galantino et al1 that investigated the quality of life and self-reported lower extremity function of adults who are HIV+ and either with or without distal sensory polyneuropathy (DSP). The Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) measure was used to assess quality of life2; the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)3 and Lower Limb Functional Index (LLFI)4 were applied to assess lower extremity functional status. One of the study's purposes was to “evaluate agreement (concordant validity) between the LEFS and LLFI in this population.”1 We were troubled by this attempted comparison for 2 reasons.

First, we believe it makes sense to compare measures only if they share the same conceptual framework. The LEFS and LLFI were developed to assess lower extremity functional status, which Bellamy5 and Dobson et al6 define as the ability to move around and perform daily activities. The focus is on ability, not on what is experienced when engaging in activity and moving around. In clinical practice, this distinction matters when planning interventions and determining whether change in the target outcome has occurred following implementation of an intervention. If the goal is to assess lower extremity functional status as defined above, the applied measure must contain items that are unique to this characteristic. Gabel et al4 have reported that LLFI items loaded on a single factor; however, factor analysis does not define the factor for us. The LLFI consists of 25 items that include questions addressing a variety of constructs, including pain, appetite, irritability, and sleep.4 On face, these types of questions do not assess the ability to move around, and we suspect the factor being assessed is linked to overall well-being. Given that the LLFI is summarized and validated as a total score, this score captures something other than the ability to move around. Was a change in LLFI score measuring change in the ability to move around, or was it a result of a change in pain, appetite, or irritability, or some combination of these constructs? If one accepts the premise that the LLFI assesses a broader construct than lower extremity functional status, its comparison with the LEFS, an instrument that assesses lower extremity functional status, is problematic.

Our second concern relates to the presentation of data comparing the LLFI and LEFS. Although concerns with direct comparisons of LLFI and LEFS scores were addressed earlier in this letter, we believe there are errors in the data presented by Galantino et al. The authors reported the extent to which there was agreement between the LEFS and LLFI by applying the method of Bland and Altman.7 This analysis is appropriate when the metrics of the 2 measures are identical. For example, Bland and Altman investigated the agreement between the Wright peak flowmeter and the Mini Wright peak flow-meter.7 For both instruments, the outcome was liters per minute. In contrast, the metrics for the LEFS and LLFI are different. One LEFS point does not equal 1 LLFI point, and the metrics cannot be homogenized by simply converting raw scores to percentage values. Item response theory methods are required to truly equate scores between the 2 measures.

Our last point addresses an apparent contradiction in the results presented by Galantino et al. In Table 2, the mean scores for the LLFI were 76.2 for patients without DSP and 43.4 for patients with DSP. For the LEFS, the mean scores were 62.2 for patients without DSP and 40.9 for patients with DSP. Figure 1 provides a graph of the differences in LEFS and LLFI scores arrived at as follows: LEFS − LLFI (thus, positive scores indicate LEFS assesses the individual at a higher level of functioning). Figure 1 shows the mean difference to be positive (LEFS scores greater than LLFI scores), and the text reports this difference to be 6.2. If the mean scores in Table 2 are reported correctly, the mean difference in Figure 1 must be negative, given that difference scores were calculated as LEFS scores minus LLFI scores. It would be helpful to have this point clarified.

Footnotes

  • This letter was posted as a Rapid Response on July 28, 2014 at ptjournal.apta.org.

  • © 2014 American Physical Therapy Association

References

  1. ↵
    1. Galantino ML,
    2. Kietrys DM,
    3. Parrott JS,
    4. et al.
    Quality of life and self-reported lower extremity function in adults with HIV-related distal sensory polyneuropathy. Phys Ther. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130337.
  2. ↵
    1. Revicki DA,
    2. Sorensen S,
    3. Wu AW
    . Reliability and validity of physical and mental health summary scores from the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey. Med Care. 1998;36:126–137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Binkley JM,
    2. Stratford PW,
    3. Lott SA,
    4. Riddle DL
    . The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. Phys Ther. 1999;79:371–383.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Gabel CP,
    2. Melloh M,
    3. Burkett B,
    4. Michener LA
    . Lower Limb Functional Index: development and clinimetric properties. Phys Ther. 2012;92:98–110.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Bellamy N
    . WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index User Guide IV. Queensland, Australia: University of Queensland; 2000.
  6. ↵
    1. Dobson F,
    2. Hinman RS,
    3. Roos EM,
    4. et al
    . OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:1042–1052.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Bland JM,
    2. Altman DG
    . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 94 Issue 9 Table of Contents
Physical Therapy: 94 (9)

Issue highlights

  • Early Intervention Post-Hospital Discharge for Infants Born Preterm
  • How Do Somatosensory Deficits in the Arm and Hand Relate to Upper Limb Impairment, Activity, and Participation Problems After Stroke? A Systematic Review
  • Effects of Whole-Body Vibration Therapy on Body Functions and Structures, Activity, and Participation Poststroke: A Systematic Review
  • AM-PAC “6-Clicks” Functional Assessment Scores Predict Acute Care Hospital Discharge Destination
  • Response to Pediatric Physical Therapy in Infants With Positional Preference and Skull Deformation
  • Identifying Items to Assess Methodological Quality in Physical Therapy Trials: A Factor Analysis
  • Can Change in Prolonged Walking Be Inferred From a Short Test of Gait Speed Among Older Adults Who Are Initially Well-Functioning?
  • Tobacco Cessation Counseling Training in US Entry-Level Physical Therapist Education Curricula: Prevalence, Content, and Associated Factors
  • Effects of the Fitkids Exercise Therapy Program on Health-Related Fitness, Walking Capacity, and Health-Related Quality of Life
  • Clinical Experience Using a 5-Week Treadmill Training Program With Virtual Reality to Enhance Gait in an Ambulatory Physical Therapy Service
  • Functional and Social Limitations After Facial Palsy: Expanded and Independent Validation of the Italian Version of the Facial Disability Index
  • Build Better Bones With Exercise: Protocol for a Feasibility Study of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of 12 Months of Home Exercise in Women With a Vertebral Fracture
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on JCORE Reference.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
On “Quality of life and self-reported lower extremity function…” Galantino ML, Kietrys DM, Parrott JS, et al. Phys Ther. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130337.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from JCORE Reference
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the JCORE Reference web site.
Print
On “Quality of life and self-reported lower extremity function…” Galantino ML, Kietrys DM, Parrott JS, et al. Phys Ther. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130337.
Paul W. Stratford, Daniel L. Riddle
Physical Therapy Sep 2014, 94 (9) 1355-1356; DOI: 10.2522/ptj.2014.94.9.1355

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Save to my folders

Share
On “Quality of life and self-reported lower extremity function…” Galantino ML, Kietrys DM, Parrott JS, et al. Phys Ther. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130337.
Paul W. Stratford, Daniel L. Riddle
Physical Therapy Sep 2014, 94 (9) 1355-1356; DOI: 10.2522/ptj.2014.94.9.1355
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • On “Benka Wallén M, Sorjonen K, Löfgren N, Franzén E. Structural validity of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) in people with mild to moderate Parkinson disease.” Phys Ther. 2016;96:1799–1806.
  • Author Response
  • Author Response
Show more Letters and Responses

Subjects

Footer Menu 1

  • menu 1 item 1
  • menu 1 item 2
  • menu 1 item 3
  • menu 1 item 4

Footer Menu 2

  • menu 2 item 1
  • menu 2 item 2
  • menu 2 item 3
  • menu 2 item 4

Footer Menu 3

  • menu 3 item 1
  • menu 3 item 2
  • menu 3 item 3
  • menu 3 item 4

Footer Menu 4

  • menu 4 item 1
  • menu 4 item 2
  • menu 4 item 3
  • menu 4 item 4
footer second
footer first
Copyright © 2013 The HighWire JCore Reference Site | Print ISSN: 0123-4567 | Online ISSN: 1123-4567
advertisement bottom
Advertisement Top