Therapists' Use of the Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) Intervention: A Practice Implementation Survey Study

Louise A. Connell; Naoimh E. McMahon; Caroline L. Watkins; Janice J. Eng

doi:10.2522/ptj.20130240

Tables

Table 1.

Respondent Characteristics (n=274)

^a UK National Health Service job bands: band 5=most junior, band 8a/8b=most senior, generally managerial or clinical specialist.
^b GRASP=Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program.

Table 2.

Therapists' Responses (%) to the “Intervention Characteristics” Statements (Shown by Therapists Who Had Experience Using GRASP^{^a} and Therapists Who Had No Experience Using GRASP)

↵^a GRASP=Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program.
^b Boldfaced P values represent significant differences.

Table 3.

Therapists' Responses (%) to the “Characteristics of Individuals” Statements (Shown by Therapists Who Had Experience Using GRASP^{^a} and Therapists Who Had No Experience Using GRASP)

↵^a GRASP=Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program.
^b Boldfaced P values represent significant differences.

Table 4.

Therapists' Responses (%) to the “Intervention Characteristics” Statements (Shown by Therapists Who Regularly Use GRASP^{^a} in Practice and Therapists Who Have Tried Using GRASP on Occasion)

↵^a GRASP=Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program.
^b Boldfaced P values represent significant differences.

Table 5.

Therapists' Responses (%) to the “Characteristics of Individuals” Statements (Shown by Therapists Who Regularly Use GRASP^{^a} in Practice and Therapists Who Have Tried Using GRASP on Occasion)