Skip to main content
  • Other Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
Advertisement
JCORE Reference
this is the JCORE Reference site slogan
  • Home
  • Most Read
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Patients
  • Reference Site Links
    • View Regions
  • Archive

On “PTJ adopts a new process for review of RCTs” [editorial]. Craik RL. Phys Ther. 2012;92:642–643.

Patrick Zerr
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.2012.92.6.877.2 Published 1 June 2012
Patrick Zerr
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

I have a question and a concern related to Dr Craik's May editorial.1 She was not very specific in stating what criteria are being considered [in the RCT methods prescreen and review]. What criteria are used for participant selection? My concern is that physical therapists are now practicing based on what a study's results are, without considering the variability among the participants. For example, in a study that examines the effect of a modality used on people ranging from teens to the elderly, the tissue structure alone is different and could respond differently to a technique, whether it is articular, muscular, or neural. My concern is that a generalization could be made to a wide population of people versus a more specific population.

  • © 2012 American Physical Therapy Association

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. Craik RL
    . PTJ adopts a new process for review of RCTs. Phys Ther. 2012;92:642–643.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 92 Issue 6 Table of Contents
Physical Therapy: 92 (6)

Issue highlights

  • Supervised Group Exercise for Low Back Pain and Pelvic Girdle Pain in Pregnancy
  • Fugl-Meyer Scale Clinically Important Difference
  • Validation of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Multiple Sclerosis
  • Effects of Patellar Taping on Brain Activity During Knee Joint Proprioception Tests Using fMRI
  • Electrodermal Response in Quadriplegia
  • Ghent Developmental Balance Test
  • Quantitative Paraspinal Muscle Measurements
  • Inspiratory Muscle Training in a Newborn With Anoxia Who Was Chronically Ventilated
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on JCORE Reference.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
On “PTJ adopts a new process for review of RCTs” [editorial]. Craik RL. Phys Ther. 2012;92:642–643.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from JCORE Reference
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the JCORE Reference web site.
Print
On “PTJ adopts a new process for review of RCTs” [editorial]. Craik RL. Phys Ther. 2012;92:642–643.
Patrick Zerr
Physical Therapy Jun 2012, 92 (6) 877-878; DOI: 10.2522/ptj.2012.92.6.877.2

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Save to my folders

Share
On “PTJ adopts a new process for review of RCTs” [editorial]. Craik RL. Phys Ther. 2012;92:642–643.
Patrick Zerr
Physical Therapy Jun 2012, 92 (6) 877-878; DOI: 10.2522/ptj.2012.92.6.877.2
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Reference
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • On “Benka Wallén M, Sorjonen K, Löfgren N, Franzén E. Structural validity of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) in people with mild to moderate Parkinson disease.” Phys Ther. 2016;96:1799–1806.
  • Author Response
  • Author Response
Show more Letters and Responses

Subjects

Footer Menu 1

  • menu 1 item 1
  • menu 1 item 2
  • menu 1 item 3
  • menu 1 item 4

Footer Menu 2

  • menu 2 item 1
  • menu 2 item 2
  • menu 2 item 3
  • menu 2 item 4

Footer Menu 3

  • menu 3 item 1
  • menu 3 item 2
  • menu 3 item 3
  • menu 3 item 4

Footer Menu 4

  • menu 4 item 1
  • menu 4 item 2
  • menu 4 item 3
  • menu 4 item 4
footer second
footer first
Copyright © 2013 The HighWire JCore Reference Site | Print ISSN: 0123-4567 | Online ISSN: 1123-4567
advertisement bottom
Advertisement Top