Skip to main content
  • Other Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
Advertisement
JCORE Reference
this is the JCORE Reference site slogan
  • Home
  • Most Read
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Patients
  • Reference Site Links
    • View Regions
  • Archive

Invited Commentary on the ICF and Physical Therapist Practice

Alan M. Jette
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.2009.0326.0327.ic Published 1 July 2010
Alan M. Jette
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Escorpizo and colleagues1 present a thoughtful argument for the well-defined utilization of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)2 in physical therapist practice documentation. To accomplish this goal, they advocate for the systematic use of assessment tools based on the ICF, specifically, the ICF Core Sets.2,3 They propose that an ICF Core Set, a short and manageable list of categories applicable to a health condition or event, can be used in clinical practice to describe and monitor the most salient aspects of the disability experience related to a patient's health condition or event. They advocate that each ICF Core Set, the product of a systematic development process that involved extensive input from experts, patients, and review of the literature, be used as the documentation template in physical therapy clinical encounters. In a companion article, Rauch et al4 illustrate how the ICF Core Sets might be used as a documentation template in a case report of a patient with spinal cord injury.

I strongly endorse the use of the ICF framework as a common language to facilitate communication among and within health care professions.5,6 Furthermore, I applaud the authors' stated goal that the physical therapy profession adopt systematic and concrete assessments based on the ICF framework for use in clinical encounters as a means of advancing physical therapist practice.7 The ICF classification of function and disability information, in principle, offers several attractive advantages.8–11 The ICF framework establishes a common language for describing health-related states and provides a systematic classification scheme for health information systems. The comprehensiveness of ICF's classification system could facilitate the widespread and systematic recording of functional status data in medical and rehabilitation patient records (at individual and institutional levels) and could influence universal design, public education, and legislation. Measures built from the ICF framework could permit comparison of health and health-related states across patients, studies, and countries, as well as across clinical services. Such measures could be used to compare the distribution and determinants of health-related states of different populations, predict health system usage and costs, and provide evidence for social policies and laws.

However, I am skeptical as to whether the ICF Core Sets, given their current level of development, are worthy of being adopted as a comprehensive classification system of functioning and disability in physical therapist practice. I believe that without further research that clearly demonstrates the psychometric adequacy of the ICF Core Sets for such an application, it is premature to advocate that the ICF Core Sets be integrated into physical therapist practice documentation. My reasons for this skepticism are as follows.

The ICF coding, which consists of a system for categorizing or classifying people's health, functioning, and disability states, meets the basic definition of measurement: the assignment of symbols to objects, individuals, or events according to systematic rules. Measurements have 4 major purposes: categorization (or classification), discrimination between groups, prediction, and evaluating change.12 As measures, ICF Core Sets must meet basic psychometric standards, including reliability, validity, and responsiveness to clinically meaningful change.

The ICF's unit of classification is discrete categories within health and health-related states, defined as the situation of each person within an array of health and health-related domains. Using ICF coding, health-related states of an individual may be recorded by selecting the appropriate category code (a nominal measure) and then adding qualifiers (ordinal measures), which are numeric codes that specify the extent or the magnitude of the functioning or disability in that category. The qualifiers identify the presence and severity of a decrement in functioning for each ICF component (ie, body functions and structures, activities and participation, and environmental factors). Each ICF code denotes a component, domain, category, and at least one qualifier. The codes are alphanumeric, beginning with a letter and followed by up to 4 or 5 digits. Qualifiers are mostly coded as one or more numbers after a decimal point. For example, one could use the ICF coding approach to classify the walking ability of Mrs Jones, an 80-year-old woman with a hip fracture, as ICF code d450.32. This specific ICF code denotes that walking is in the activities and participation domain (alphabetical code d), the mobility domain (chapter 4), and the walking category (50) and that the patient has severe performance difficulty (3) and moderate difficulty with capacity (2).

From a methodological perspective, the magnitude of measurement error inherent in using the ICF Core Sets is currently unknown. As the authors themselves conclude, “One important caveat is that neither the ICF, as a classification, nor the ICF generic Core Set, as an extraction from it, should be considered a substitute for standard clinical outcome measures. Psychometric evidence (reliability and responsiveness to change) for ICF-derived measures is lacking.”1 Is now the time to advocate using the ICF Core Sets as an evaluation and documentation system for use in physical therapist clinical practice? At the present stage of development, do we know the degree to which the ICF Core Set classifications are reliable when used by patients or by different therapists? Do we know the magnitude of measurement error when used over time to gauge a patient's level of improvement? How is a clinician to evaluate changes in ICF codes such as those reported in Rauch and colleagues' case report?4 Have the ICF Core Sets been subjected to thorough psychometric evaluation and testing in clinical applications such as those being advocated by the authors?

The ICF single-item coding approach to categorization with qualifiers consists of nominal and ordinal level of measurement.13 I fear that single-item measures such as these are fraught with considerable measurement error. For example, Okochi et al,14 in one of the few studies of test-retest reliability of the ICF Core Sets, found ICF qualifiers of body function and activities and participation items to have low test-retest reliability within a 1-week interval with a sample of stable elderly individuals using long-term care services in Japan. With low test-retest reliability, the user cannot be confident in the ability of ICF coding to distinguish clinically meaningful change in heath-related states from measurement error. The ICF coding may have limited utility for classifying individual states of health, discriminating ICF health-related states between groups of people, or evaluating meaningful change over time.

Might it not be more prudent to advocate the careful evaluation of the ICF Core Sets first to determine whether the ICF coding approach is psychometrically adequate for use in clinical practice? In the absence of psychometric evaluation, how can a clinician interpret the clinical relevance of the ICF Core Sets for use in physical therapist practice?

    • © 2010 American Physical Therapy Association

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Escorpizo R,
      2. Stucki G,
      3. Cieza A,
      4. et al
      . Creating an interface between the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and physical therapist practice. Phys Ther. 2010;90:1054–1063.
      OpenUrl
    2. ↵
      International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland; World Health Organization; 2001.
    3. ↵
      1. Cieza A,
      2. Ewert T,
      3. Üstün B,
      4. et al
      . Development of ICF Core Sets for patients with chronic conditions. J Rehabil Med. July 2004(44 suppl):9–11.
    4. ↵
      1. Rauch A,
      2. Escorpizo R,
      3. Riddle DL,
      4. et al
      . Using a case report of a patient with spinal cord injury to illustrate the application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health during multidisciplinary patient management. Phys Ther. 2010;90:1039–1052.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    5. ↵
      1. Jette AM
      . Disablement models: toward a common language for function, disability, and health. Phys Ther. 2006;86:726–734.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    6. ↵
      1. Jette AM
      . Toward a common language of disablement. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;11:1165–1168.
      OpenUrl
    7. ↵
      1. Jette AM,
      2. Norweg A,
      3. Haley SM
      . Achieving meaningful measurements of ICF concepts. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:963–969.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    8. ↵
      1. Stucki G,
      2. Ewert T,
      3. Cieza A
      . Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:628–634.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    9. ↵
      1. Steiner W,
      2. Ryser L,
      3. Huber E,
      4. et al
      . Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Phys Ther. 2002;82:1098–1107.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    10. ↵
      1. Peterson DB
      . International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: an introduction for rehabilitation psychologists. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;50:105–112.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    11. ↵
      1. Iezzoni LI,
      2. Greenberg M
      . Capturing and classifying functional status information in administrative databases. Health Care Financ Rev. 2003;24:61–76.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    12. ↵
      1. Kerlinger F
      . Foundations of Behavioral Research. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1973.
    13. ↵
      1. Nunnally JC,
      2. Bernstein IH
      . Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
    14. ↵
      1. Okochi J,
      2. Utsunomiya S,
      3. Takahashi T
      . Health measurement using the ICF: test-retest reliability study of ICF codes and qualifiers in geriatric care. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:46–58.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    View Abstract
    Back to top
    Vol 96 Issue 12 Table of Contents
    Physical Therapy: 96 (12)

    Issue highlights

    • Musculoskeletal Impairments Are Often Unrecognized and Underappreciated Complications From Diabetes
    • Physical Therapist–Led Ambulatory Rehabilitation for Patients Receiving CentriMag Short-Term Ventricular Assist Device Support: Retrospective Case Series
    • Education Research in Physical Therapy: Visions of the Possible
    • Predictors of Reduced Frequency of Physical Activity 3 Months After Injury: Findings From the Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study
    • Use of Perturbation-Based Gait Training in a Virtual Environment to Address Mediolateral Instability in an Individual With Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation
    • Effect of Virtual Reality Training on Balance and Gait Ability in Patients With Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • Effects of Locomotor Exercise Intensity on Gait Performance in Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
    • Case Series of a Knowledge Translation Intervention to Increase Upper Limb Exercise in Stroke Rehabilitation
    • Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Interventions to Improve Gait Speed in Children With Cerebral Palsy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    • Reliability and Validity of Force Platform Measures of Balance Impairment in Individuals With Parkinson Disease
    • Measurement Properties of Instruments for Measuring of Lymphedema: Systematic Review
    • myMoves Program: Feasibility and Acceptability Study of a Remotely Delivered Self-Management Program for Increasing Physical Activity Among Adults With Acquired Brain Injury Living in the Community
    • Application of Intervention Mapping to the Development of a Complex Physical Therapist Intervention
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on JCORE Reference.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Invited Commentary on the ICF and Physical Therapist Practice
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from JCORE Reference
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the JCORE Reference web site.
    Print
    Invited Commentary on the ICF and Physical Therapist Practice
    Alan M. Jette
    Physical Therapy Jul 2010, 90 (7) 1064-1065; DOI: 10.2522/ptj.2009.0326.0327.ic

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Save to my folders

    Share
    Invited Commentary on the ICF and Physical Therapist Practice
    Alan M. Jette
    Physical Therapy Jul 2010, 90 (7) 1064-1065; DOI: 10.2522/ptj.2009.0326.0327.ic
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One
    • Article
      • References
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    Related Articles

    Cited By...

    More in this TOC Section

    • Creating an Interface Between the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and Physical Therapist Practice
    • Using a Case Report of a Patient With Spinal Cord Injury to Illustrate the Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health During Multidisciplinary Patient Management
    Show more Focus on the ICF

    Subjects

    • International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)
    • Disability Models

    Footer Menu 1

    • menu 1 item 1
    • menu 1 item 2
    • menu 1 item 3
    • menu 1 item 4

    Footer Menu 2

    • menu 2 item 1
    • menu 2 item 2
    • menu 2 item 3
    • menu 2 item 4

    Footer Menu 3

    • menu 3 item 1
    • menu 3 item 2
    • menu 3 item 3
    • menu 3 item 4

    Footer Menu 4

    • menu 4 item 1
    • menu 4 item 2
    • menu 4 item 3
    • menu 4 item 4
    footer second
    footer first
    Copyright © 2013 The HighWire JCore Reference Site | Print ISSN: 0123-4567 | Online ISSN: 1123-4567
    advertisement bottom
    Advertisement Top