Abstract
Background Physical therapists and occupational therapists experience high rates of work-related pain. Although most therapists continue to work through this pain, it interferes with work and alters therapists’ work habits. However, the effects on productivity, quality of patient care, and therapists’ quality of life and long-term career plans are unknown.
Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of working with work-related pain on physical therapists and occupational therapists.
Design Multiple methods were used in this study. It was primarily a phenomenological study.
Methods A phenomenological approach was used to explore the meaning of work-related pain in therapists. Focus group interviews were used as the method of data collection. A questionnaire was used to supplement the qualitative analysis.
Results Nineteen therapists participated in 4 focus groups ranging from 2 to 7 participants each. The participants noted substantial effects of work-related pain at work, at home, and in their career plans. All of the therapists were concerned about their potential clinical longevity. The professional culture complicated these effects by forcing therapists into a professional ideal.
Conclusions Work-related pain affects therapists in several personal and professional domains. It also may affect career plans. Strategies to reduce the risk of injury and physical loading of jobs are needed.
Physical therapists and occupational therapists experience high rates of work-related pain.1–3 The most commonly affected body regions include the low back, neck, shoulder, and hand or wrist.2,3 The prevalence of work-related pain reported in earlier studies ranged from 40% to 80%.1,3–6 Cromie et al2 reported a 1-year prevalence of work-related pain in any body region of 80%. Campo et al3 reported a 1-year prevalence of 58%. Additionally, 20.7% of the therapists studied had a newly developed case of work-related pain with a severity of at least 4/10 on a visual analog scale (ratings of 0–10) and that lasted at least 1 week or was present at least once per month. Darragh et al1 reported 1-year work-related injury incidence rates of 16.5 per 100 full-time occupational therapists and 16.9 per 100 full-time physical therapists.
Evidence exists that therapists in the United States typically continue to work despite pain.1,3 In fact, fewer than one fifth of therapists with work-related pain lose any work time at all,3 and most continue to work while injured or in pain.4,7 Therapists are able to recognize symptoms, use physical agents, perform therapeutic exercises, and self-treat.6 These factors help explain why therapists choose to continue working while in pain.
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders affect therapists as they continue to work. Physical therapists who continued to work with pain reported modifications of their work activities, including outsourcing (seeking help from others with patients who were heavy or uncooperative) and altering or avoiding certain techniques.2 More than 70% of physical therapists and occupational therapists with work-related pain reported altering their work habits because of their pain.1,7 Approximately one third to one half of therapists with work-related pain reported that it interfered with their work.1,8
The alteration of work habits in response to work-related pain has not been explored in therapists. The effects of work-related pain on job satisfaction, career longevity, productivity, and quality of care also have not been explored. Earlier research was conducted with physical therapists who left the profession because of work-related pain9 and therapists who claimed worker's compensation,10 but the consequences of continuing to work while experiencing work-related pain have received little attention.
Work-related pain may affect clinical longevity. Research has indicated that 31% of physical therapists and 27% of occupational therapists with work-related pain considered changing jobs or changed jobs because of their condition,1 although the actual number of therapists who leave the profession has yet to be determined. Given that as many as one half of therapists in each profession experience work-related pain each year and that increased demands for both physical therapists and occupational therapists are projected by the Bureau of Labor Statistics,11 the impact of work-related pain on therapists’ career plans deserves exploration.
The purpose of this study was to examine the experience of working with pain and how that interacts with work and nonwork activities, job satisfaction, and career planning in occupational therapists and physical therapists. We sought to examine, qualitatively, the experience of work-related pain in occupational therapists and physical therapists who continue to work with pain.
Method
Design
Multiple methods were used in this study. First and foremost, a phenomenological approach was used to explore the meaning of work-related pain in currently practicing therapists. A phenomenological study is one in which the essence, or central meaning, of a shared experience is elucidated from the perspective of the participants.12,13 Focus group interviews were used as the method of data collection. They have the advantage of participant interaction, they stimulate discussion of salient topics, and they allow for the contributions of multiple participants in a limited time period.14 In addition, quantitative information on work-related pain severity, work productivity, and the impact of work-related pain on work activities was collected with a questionnaire. The questionnaire data helped to ensure that participants would provide detailed descriptions of their background information, work situations, and work-related pain. These data also were used for comparative analysis during triangulation procedures.
Participants
Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants and to ensure that both disciplines were represented. Participants were identified through word of mouth and informational flyers. “Snowball” sampling also was used: potential participants were encouraged to refer colleagues whom they thought would be appropriate for the study. Eligibility was determined through telephone screening or e-mail communication, depending on how the participants first contacted us. Participants were reminded that they had to be currently experiencing work-related pain to participate. No criteria with regard to duration, frequency, location, or severity of pain were used. Once participants were identified, we explained the purpose of the study and the participation requirements. All participants had to be currently working as physical therapists or occupational therapists and had to be providing direct patient care on a daily basis.
Nineteen therapists (10 occupational therapists and 9 physical therapists) participated in this study (Table). Seventeen of the respondents were female and 2 were male. There were wide variations in both age (X̅=37.5 years, SD=13.4 years) and experience (X̅=12.9 years, SD=11.9 years). Three participants reported having children. Two participants had young children at home: 1 therapist had 2 children, and the other therapist had 1 child. Both of them lived with their spouses. One of the participants had 2 older children who were no longer living at home. All participants received, reviewed, and signed informed consent documents before participation in the study.
Procedure
Eligible participants were invited to participate in 1 of 4 focus groups. Each focus group consisted of 2 to 7 participants, and the sessions took place on a local college campus and lasted approximately 2 hours. The individual groups consisted of 2, 5, 5, and 7 participants. Two of the 4 groups consisted of occupational therapists and physical therapists, 1 group included only occupational therapists, and 1 group included only physical therapists. We facilitated the discussions by following a pre-established interview guide. The focus group discussions were recorded and transcribed. The transcripts then were checked against the recordings for accuracy. After each focus group session, participants completed a 4-page questionnaire about their work-related pain.
Data Collection
In the focus group sessions, participants answered a series of general questions about their work-related pain (Appendix 1). Probes were used to focus and clarify participants’ answers. After each focus group meeting, we met for debriefing sessions to discuss nonverbal communications, procedural difficulties that arose, and the questions in the interview guide. The debriefing after the second focus group meeting led us to modify the interview guide. Participants reported that the effect of pain on job satisfaction was minimal. They reported changes in their work habits, but they reported more substantial effects in 2 other domains: life outside of work and career plans. The second set of questions was reorganized to address these issues more carefully.
Instrumentation
Once the discussions concluded, participants were asked to complete a 4-page questionnaire that relied on quantitative measures to gather information about pain, job satisfaction, and the effects of working while in pain on work activities. The questionnaire, adapted from the instrument used by Campo et al,3 included items on demographics, work setting and hours, and work-related pain. Participants were directed to answer questions about work-related pain in the preceding 12 months. The location, frequency, duration, and severity of pain were assessed for each body region. Severity was assessed with a visual analog scale.
Questions related to “presenteeism,” productivity, and job satisfaction also were included. Decreased presenteeism occurs when workers who are injured or sick continue to work but are less productive and less effective.15 For this analysis, the Stanford Presenteeism Scale (SPS) was used.16 The SPS results in 2 scores: the Work Impairment Score (WIS) and the Work Output Score (WOS). The WIS is derived from 11 questions on perceptions of how health problems affect a person's functioning at work. It is an estimate of the percentage of lost productivity. The WOS is the result of a single question. It is an estimate of the self-assessed percentage of usual productivity. All questions addressed a 4-week recall period.
The SPS is applicable to both knowledge-based jobs and production-based jobs and has very good psychometric properties.17 The internal reliability of the WIS is high (α=.82), and the WIS and the WOS are significantly negatively correlated (r=.60, P<.001). In terms of criterion (concurrent) validity, the WIS is moderately correlated (r=.50) with the Work Limitations Questionnaire (another instrument for measuring presenteeism). In terms of convergent validity, the WIS is significantly negatively correlated with the subscales of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire (r=−.25 to r=−.62). Further data on the validation of the SPS are described by Turpin et al.17
Data Analysis
Although the questionnaire data were not intended for primary analysis in this project, they were used to determine demographic characteristics, to provide information on work-related pain, and to confirm the qualitative findings. The data were entered into SPSS version 16* and analyzed with descriptive statistics.
A qualitative approach was used to analyze participants’ comments made during the focus group discussions. We read and coded the transcripts using a method of constant comparison: Data were compared with emerging codes and categories throughout the analysis.18 We used this method to systematically identify codes (key words or phrases summarizing comments), collapse them into larger categories (groups of related codes), and finally identify larger emergent themes (larger concepts representing the codes and categories associated with the topics covered during the interviews). This process is highly structured and requires multiple steps to identify final themes, with each step being documented and maintained in a detailed audit trail (Fig. 1).12,13,18
Qualitative research process. OTs=occupational therapists, PTs=physical therapists.
We read the transcripts and wrote code words in the margins to reflect the meaning of the phrase or passage. We then discussed the codes and developed a master code list. Using this list, we individually recoded the passages, again discussed our coding choices, and reached a consensus about the codes and associated passages. All quotes then were organized by code, and we individually reconsidered the codes to ensure that they accurately reflected the meaning of the quotes they represented. After this process, we reviewed our coding decisions, collapsed certain codes into clusters, and reorganized quotes that were thought to be coded inappropriately. Finally, we individually developed overall themes19 and discussed them to reach a consensus.
We reviewed the comments related to each theme to ensure that comments from both physical therapists and occupational therapists contributed substantially to every theme. They also confirmed that comments supporting the themes represented all 4 focus groups.
Strategies for Achieving Trustworthiness
Multiple verification procedures were used before and during the study to improve the credibility and trustworthiness of the data and results. From the outset, we engaged in a process of reflection to clarify our personal and professional biases. We described and acknowledged these presuppositions and then examined the focus group questions and interpretations of the data for any undue influence of these biases throughout the analytic process.13 This process is formally referred to as epoche. These biases included the concerns that both of us were passionate about safe patient handling and the prevention of work-related pain in occupational therapists and physical therapists. They also included the concerns that both of us believed that aspects of occupational therapists’ and physical therapists’ work are not safe and can lead to or contribute to work-related pain. As a result, we attempted to ensure that the effects of injury were not being highlighted to the exclusion of other information and were not being exaggerated during the analysis.
Multiple forms of triangulation, including triangulation of observers, analysts, and methods, were used.12 To triangulate observers, we both served as the primary facilitators for 2 groups.12 Although the interviewers had some similar assumptions about the demands and risks associated with the practice of occupational therapy and physical therapy, their perspectives on professional practice and culture varied because of their occupational backgrounds. Each also served as a secondary interviewer and transcriptionist and listened for bias or leading questions during the discussions for 2 of the 4 groups. Each focus group meeting was followed by a debriefing session in which we reflected on the discussions and considered revising the interview guide.
Triangulation of analysts also was used.12 Each researcher coded and categorized the transcripts independently, met to compare codes and reach a consensus, and then continued separately again (Fig. 1). A related strategy is member checking, in which study participants review the data analysis.13 In the present study, member checking was used to validate the themes that were identified. According to Lincoln and Guba,20 this is the “most critical technique for establishing credibility.”13 Four participants (2 occupational therapists and 2 physical therapists) reviewed and confirmed the themes. The participants were chosen so that there would be equal representation of occupational therapists and physical therapists. Four was selected as the initial number to ensure that there would be at least 2 opinions from both occupational groups. Had the participants not agreed with the themes, additional participants would have been consulted and the themes would have been reconsidered until a consensus was achieved.
Triangulation of methods, a form of comparative analysis, was used to confirm pain severity, productivity at work, and job satisfaction reported by the participants.12 Questions related to pain, productivity, and job satisfaction were included in the questionnaire, and the answers were compared with the qualitative findings. Other strategies used to increase trustworthiness included comparing the interview notes and debriefing session notes to confirm our interpretations of the data.
Role of the Funding Source
This research was supported, in part, by a Mercy College Faculty Development Grant. No one involved with the grant review process had any involvement with the study or input into the way in which the study was designed or conducted.
Results
Participant Characteristics
At the time of the focus group sessions, all of the participants had work-related pain, with one exception. She reported that she had been free of pain in the preceding 4 weeks but had experienced pain in the preceding 12 months. So as not to disrupt the group process, she participated in the discussion. Her answers were carefully examined for any inconsistencies with those of the rest of the group, and none were detected. Overall, the participants described moderate to severe pain in multiple body parts and described multiple symptoms, including pain, numbness, and tingling. They identified specific diagnoses, including bursitis, thoracic outlet syndrome, degeneration, sciatica, herniated disks, torn menisci, and migraine headaches.
Questionnaire Data: Work-Related Pain, Presenteeism, and Job Satisfaction
The participants rated their work-related pain on severity, frequency, and duration across multiple body parts on the 4-page questionnaire. They reported injuries of moderate to major severity in multiple body parts (Table). Three of the 19 participants reported having lost work time in the preceding 4 weeks (5, 7, and 8 hours) because of work-related pain.
On the SPS, the WOS revealed that all but 2 participants reported that their productivity was 90% or greater compared with their usual levels. The average self-reported productivity in the preceding 4 weeks was 92.3% (SD=6.97%). The WIS indicated an average impairment of 35.1% (SD=13.71%).
The participants also rated their overall job satisfaction. Eighteen of the participants were either very satisfied (n=7) or fairly satisfied (n=11) with their jobs. One therapist was fairly dissatisfied. None of the participants were very dissatisfied or completely dissatisfied with their working conditions. No therapist was completely satisfied, either.
Emergent Themes
Four major themes emerged from the data: professional ideals, work habits, life outside of work, and career plans (Appendix 2).
Professional ideals.
The participants aspired to a professional ideal that included dedication, self-sacrifice, compassion, and clinical expertise. This professional perspective influenced their behaviors with regard to work-related pain: They all continued to care for their patients while in pain, some minimized or did not report their pain, and others engaged in self-diagnosis and treatment of symptoms (or accessed colleagues to do the same). Most of the participants did not miss any work time because of their symptoms and continued to perform activities that exacerbated these symptoms. Most emphasized that they did not take time off because of their work-related pain unless “I can’t get out of bed.” Several indicated that going to work helped them feel better “because you are helping someone else feel better.” Two aspects of the professional culture, professional identity and responsibility, help explain these behaviors.
A professional identity that combined a self-image of strength, athleticism, and independence with expertise in musculoskeletal health emerged. This identity made it difficult for the participants to reconcile their pain and change their work practices to improve their comfort. One therapist commented, “I felt that, I have to be like superwoman.” Another explained that working as a therapist requires her to be “thin and athletic.”
Expertise in the diagnosis and treatment of their own musculoskeletal disorders contributed to this identity, and the therapists reported that their knowledge helped them decide whether their symptoms were significant or not:
… we usually know what's going on with ourselves. So we say, “No, it's OK, it's safe for us to keep going,” or … we’re able to self-diagnose or diagnose each other and we know that it’ll get better.
They reported that this knowledge differentiated them from other professionals:
I think that different professions have different mindsets … different priorities that they will set, and I think as therapists, we know what the pain is and if it's anything to be worried about, so we will just continue to keep working, where other professions, … they may not realize that there's something that you can do for it and still be able to do your job.
Experiencing work-related pain challenged their professional identity and affected their self-identity:
… it almost changes your identity because it seems like people who get into physical therapy are athletic … you come from this elite kind of place where you’re very competitive and you’re athletic and you really just want to keep going through things. It changes your self-image of who you are.
They felt pressure to hide the pain, not report it, and work despite the pain. The participants blamed themselves for the pain that they experienced:
That's what we were taught. Use good body mechanics and you’re fine. So you almost pretend, “I don’t want to be looking like a bad therapist and say this hurts, so I’ll just do it and endure it, because maybe I’m not using good body mechanics.”
The participants described a strong sense of professional responsibility to patients and coworkers. Commitment to coworkers and the resultant guilt at burdening them encouraged participants to continue to work regardless of pain severity. Several identified staffing shortages, in particular, as contributing to the burden:
I actually feel guilty not going into work as to what therapist am I inconveniencing. Who has to take over my patients?
The participants felt responsibility toward their patients (eg, “I have never said, ‘No, I will not take that patient,’ because this is my job.”) and were reluctant to let their symptoms interfere with patient care (eg, “I knew I hurt myself, but I was doing an eval, and I had to do the eval—you don’t just not do it—and I sat on the floor … in a lot of discomfort….”).
They emphasized the caring nature of the profession and possessed both a desire and a sense of duty to care for others:
You are the one that's supposed to help heal, you know what I mean, you’re the one that's taking care of the ones that are really hurting.
They found patient treatment and progress to be rewarding, and these goals motivated them to continue to work, even when they were experiencing pain:
Because I enjoy what I do, and I enjoy working with the people that I work with, it's almost like you want to be there. You want to see that patient get out of bed, you want to see that person walk because you’ve been investing all your time, and your patient's, for this [moment].
The participants also experienced professional pressure to continue to work, and taking time off affected how they were perceived by their peers:
I also think it's perceived, perhaps by your staff or other people you work with, if you are not putting in that 100% that you’re not a good therapist.
They discussed asking others for help during activities that placed them at risk of further pain or injury. However, they were divided on whether this practice was acceptable. Many participants said that asking others for help was acceptable:
I’ve let go of having to transfer that 200-pound person by myself or kind of feeling like I don’t have to ask for help.
However, some participants either were unable to obtain help or thought that it took too much time to wait for help:
I will admit, sometimes I don’t, because you’re waiting for 15 to 20 minutes before someone comes and helps you.
Work habits.
Work-related pain affected the participants’ daily work habits despite the dedication and responsibility cited above. They adapted their work to compensate for their discomfort, making changes in how they organized their days and modifying the ways in which they performed treatment activities. They expressed concern about the effects of their pain on the quality of patient care and engaged in a process of reflection on their ability to provide effective patient care.
The participants had enough professional autonomy to be able to make changes in their daily work processes. One common adaptation was altering the daily work schedule. They used strategies such as inserting supervisory tasks in between clinical visits, reorganizing appointments so that patients requiring more challenging treatment activities could be seen in the morning, scheduling appointments when several therapists were available to help with moving and treating patients, and arranging cotreatment sessions with occupational therapists and physical therapists:
… I literally structure my day, especially if I’m having a bad day; I’ll structure my harder patients in the morning because I know that by the end of the day, I’m just not going to be there physically.
Many therapists adapted by avoiding certain activities or altering treatment plans because of their symptoms. Typically, these measures were taken to reduce exertion associated with transfers, gait training, and manual therapy. One therapist stated:
… sometimes you find yourself using, doing other things with them so you don’t have to transfer them.
Another explained:
I’ll just do one trigger point, tell them to “breathe through it and then go stretch yourself.” I won’t stretch it manually, I’ll just have them do it themselves.
Others changed the ways in which they performed tasks while in pain by modifying the technique or the environment:
It [pain] has made me more of a cautious therapist. And I don’t think I work with the children as physically as I used to.
I rely a lot more on the equipment in the gym now; if I know that they’re a hard transfer from sit to stand, then I put them on the mat and then I just elevate the mat instead of picking them up myself, so then they can do it themselves.
Some therapists asked patients to do more than they normally would have. This practice was perceived as beneficial for the patients as well as themselves:
I have a patient right now … and he walks like a turtle. I told him today that “my back is really hurting, you have to take bigger steps, and you have to help yourself more …”; he speeds up, so it helps him out….
Most participants expressed deep concern about maintaining the quality of care of patients and asserted that their care was not compromised. They engaged in a process of reflection to assess whether working in pain or adapting their work affected the quality of patient care. Many indicated that they would stop practicing if they could not provide valuable and skilled treatment. One participant stated:
I really try and assess whether I am being effective with them or not.
Some participants, however, provided examples of situations in which quality of care might have been affected by their symptoms:
I have one home care case, and I complain about it, and I only have one, and I shouldn’t even be complaining. But I don’t want to go there; I want to go, like my heart's there, but it's a child with CP [cerebral palsy] who's now 3 years old and he's huge, and he has no trunk control, nothing, and I want to be there, but by the time I get there, I feel like I’m not being beneficial towards him.
I hate to admit it, but my 4 to 6 (pm) patients might be getting gypped.
The effectiveness and necessity of using manual therapy (which increased pain) were debated at length. Therapists working in outpatient settings, in particular, varied in the amount of manual therapy they provided and whether they thought it was necessary. While discussing the use of exercise-based interventions instead of manual therapy, several participants asserted that patients expect hands-on manual treatment and that this expectation influences treatment decisions:
I have people, colleagues that I work with, that they don’t really do a lot of manual therapy, and it shows up in their kind of work and patients are not satisfied.
Interactions between therapists and patients were influenced by the therapists’ symptoms. The participants thought that at times they had worse pain than their patients:
You ever have a patient complain to you and just look at them and think, “If you only knew.”?
Some therapists expressed irritation and decreased patience with their patients:
Like when someone comes in to me and says, “Oh, I have tightness in my upper trap,” I mean honestly, my first reaction, the bubble says, “Suck it up.”
Patients also noticed therapists’ discomfort. One therapist explained:
I had my (cervical) collar on; the patient's like, “You’re gonna help me? Get me a new therapist—I’ll take that guy.”
The participants reported no specific incidents in which the safety of patients was compromised but expressed concern that it could be. In particular, they worried about their symptoms affecting their ability to transfer or move a patient safely:
I’m always afraid that … I’m going to drop somebody; it's all of a sudden going to happen and I’m going to drop someone.
They also were concerned for their own safety, and that concern interfered with clinical decision making (eg, “… the fear of hurting yourself more isn’t letting you do what you have to do.”).
These daily changes in the work process and concerns regarding the quality of work reflected the less immediately obvious effects of pain on therapy services. The process of the work changed, but the visible output remained the same (ie, patients were still seen and cared for). Productivity, perhaps the most obvious measure of decreased work output, did not emerge as a primary theme. Most, although not all, of the participants stated that they did not reduce their patient case loads and continued to treat everyone who was assigned to them.
Life outside of work.
In addition to work-related effects of pain, the participants described many ways in which their symptoms affected them outside of work. The participants performed all or most job-related duties but endured significant consequences in their personal lives. Many returned home at the end of the work day or weekend too fatigued or in too much pain to participate in other types of activities. One therapist noted:
I never took naps in my life before. I’m just so physically exhausted; you know, pain makes you tired, it really does.
In addition, they identified multiple psychosocial consequences of pain, including depression, sadness, anxiety, frustration, and resentment (eg, “It [pain] makes me grumpy … complaining all the time.”). Activity limitations were pervasive and included decreased participation in leisure activities, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, and social activities.
Some participants changed the ways in which they performed leisure activities, others changed the types of activities, and some no longer engaged in activities that were important to them:
I haven’t been backpacking in I don’t know how long because the idea of having a 40-pound backpack, you know, I can’t do it. So those kinds of activities that bring me so much joy, I’m not able to do….
Some participants reported that vacations required special planning. Travel was a distinct consideration for some, who worried about an increase in symptoms while flying or driving. Others considered the effect of vacation activities on their pain and whether they would be able to return to work after the vacation. A few reported that they did not change their leisure activities and often experienced pain as a result.
Work-related pain affected activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living, including rest and sleep, health management, home management, child rearing, decisions about whether to have children, and community mobility, in several ways. Health management was mentioned by almost all participants in all groups. In particular, eating, exercise, and weight gain were prominent topics:
Sometimes if you’re in that much pain, you’re going to limit what you’re doing for your workout, cause you’re already doing your workout at work, and when you’re in pain, you’re like, “I’m not doing any more.”
Although most therapists limited exercise because of pain, 2 participants remarked that they exercised more:
… last night I got out of work, I forced myself on a Friday to work out for an hour 15 minutes because it makes me feel better.
The participants asserted that pain affected their appetite and ability to control their weight. In fact, most reported weight gain since the onset of their work-related pain and attributed it to a reduction in physical exercise and a change in eating habits. Several therapists reported craving carbohydrates and other “comfort foods” as a way to cope with their physical and emotional symptoms. This behavior conflicted with their self-image of athleticism:
I’ve put on a lot of weight. I’ve put on, I think, 15 to 25 pounds this year because I haven’t been able to do what I want to do.
Home management activities were affected by work-related pain. Participants were limited in their ability to cook, clean, and participate in home maintenance and, in some cases, relied on their partners to take over:
I agree. It's like, “OK, you want dinner, I’m not cooking it.” I can’t stand, and it's even if I do make dinner, like the kitchen's a disaster because I can’t stand to wash the dishes because that just puts me over the edge, that static standing.
Only 2 participants mentioned their children. In each case, pain affected their interactions with them:
Sometimes like at the end of the day if I’m working early mornings or an afternoon and I come home, he’ll always want to jump and wrestle … but sometimes I can’t.
Some of the participants without children worried about managing the demands of child care with pain:
We don’t have kids yet, but sometimes it's kind of sad to think [about] having a major headache, or not being able to run with them, or not being able to be as patient.
Most participants experienced limited engagement in social lives. To some, this was most evident in their interpersonal communication with significant others:
You don’t want to talk to anybody. You talk to the people at work, and then you don’t want to talk to anyone at home, cause you’re upset that you’re in pain, and you’re tired.
You’ve been able to accomplish all these major goals in your life, and then it's just too much to go out to dinner and you feel bad. I feel really bad for my [partner] sometimes.
Others reported significant limitations in social activities:
… for me, when it comes to do something fun, if it is not a mandatory thing I’m less apt to do it.
Career plans.
Work-related pain affected long-term planning by the participants. Reflections on the future included fear and anxiety about the ability to continue this career, planning for a different career, and planning for a different direction within the profession of occupational therapy or physical therapy.
Most participants were satisfied with their jobs, enjoyed working with patients, and found their work rewarding. One major concern, however, was longevity. Most participants doubted their ability to work in a clinical capacity for much longer and expressed fear and anxiety about their professional future. Often, the anxiety represented fear of the future and their ability to continue to practice (eg, “… I’m 33 years old and I’m thinking, ‘Oh, God, am I going to last?’ …”).
They described frustration with their pain, and some felt resentment or anger toward patients, whom they perceived placed them at risk:
I’m holding her up, so I was concerned that she could end up on the floor and I could end my career, and I was resentful…. I was mad. I was mad at her.
Some were actively considering leaving the profession:
I told you I’m out…. In like 2 years, I’m out … something completely different.
I don’t know if OT [occupational therapy] is for me in terms of the work that I’m doing because I’m 30 and I’m not sure if I’m already having these issues, what's going to happen, so it's been really, really challenging.
Others were planning on staying in the profession in different capacities:
I’ve gone back to the doctoral program. So if the day comes that I can’t be manually treating patients, then I’ll have some options to still be within the field and maybe in the education realm instead of the clinical end of it.
Among participants who experienced anxiety about their professional careers, some questioned their career choice, others expressed concern about making a career change, and many had fears about their future:
I’ll admit there are some days when I go home, my body hurts, and I don’t understand why I chose this profession. So that's the honest truth. When you’re in that much pain, you’re like, “Why am I doing this to myself?”
I worry about what's the next step. Do I cut back my hours more and more?
Despite the levels of work-related pain noted by the participants, almost all of them thought that work was rewarding. They were satisfied with their jobs and valued the caring aspect of their work. Most participants enjoyed contact with patients and reported that caring for patients improved their mood and sometimes their symptoms:
You go to work and you love your patients. This is what makes you feel good. You know? I like going to work.
Many were concerned about having to do something else and did not want to leave the profession, but acknowledged the physical demands of the work:
I love what I do, I really enjoy it, and I want to continue it. I don’t see myself doing anything else, but yeah, you need to be strong.
Discussion
The aims of the present study were to explore the experiences of therapists who continue to work while in pain and to examine the interactions between working in pain and work activities, career planning, job satisfaction, and quality of life. Participants shared their insights on all of these topics, and our thematic analysis revealed the complexities of work-related pain in therapists. We were able to develop a conceptual model of pain that encompassed the wide-ranging and substantial effects of work-related pain.
Conceptual Model of Pain in Therapists
The emergent themes were interrelated and reflected more global areas for study. Impaired presenteeism and its relationship to quality of care, quality of life, and professional culture are important topics to examine in light of the findings of the present study. Figure 2 is a conceptual model of pain in occupational and physical therapists. In this model, therapists develop work-related pain but maintain a relatively full case load because of their professional ideals (professional identity and responsibility to others). Rather than burden coworkers or sacrifice patient care, they adapt their work processes and change their treatment approaches. Continuing to work in pain affects life outside of work, in particular, participation in social and health management activities. Both being unable to manage health and continuing to work at full productivity can lead to more pain. The difficulties of working with pain, altered personal lives, and concerns about quality of care force therapists with pain to reconsider their career plans. Although there is no direct relationship between professional ideals and work-related pain, ideals influence other factors in ways that can perpetuate the pain cycle.
Conceptual model of emergent themes.
Professional Culture
The present study illustrates the complexity of the experience of work-related pain in physical therapists and occupational therapists. Work-related pain profoundly affected daily work and participation in nonwork activities. Despite their pain, therapists performed work-related activities that they considered to be risky on an almost daily basis. They considered working with patients, manual therapy, and other tasks to be significant risk factors for pain and experienced increased pain when performing these tasks. They made decisions about their personal health and safety, in part, on the basis of a culture of caring and a professional identity of athleticism, knowledge about musculoskeletal health, and expertise in working with patients. They felt pressure from others and placed pressure on themselves to place the needs of patients and coworkers above their own.
These findings can be explained from the perspectives of professional culture and professional expertise. In a study of physical therapists who left the profession because of a work-related musculoskeletal disorder, Cromie et al9 reported that therapists viewed themselves as unlikely to experience an injury because they were young, athletic, and knowledgeable. They also blamed themselves for the work-related musculoskeletal disorder, assuming that they had made a mistake that resulted in the injury, and placed themselves at risk to meet the expectations of patients and colleagues. Alnaser21 reported that occupational therapists with a work-related musculoskeletal disorder also blamed themselves for the injury, thought that they could not report the injury, and experienced anger and depression as a result of the injury.
This type of behavior can perpetuate a cycle of pain and work that could eventually limit career longevity. Like the therapists in the study of Alnaser,21 the therapists in the present study thought that they would have to decide shortly whether to change settings or even careers. They all continued to work with pain despite increased symptoms.
Professional ideals and virtues receive substantial attention in the therapy literature, and a strong emphasis on the needs of patients is common. Jensen et al22 developed a model of expert practice in physical therapy. Their model of expertise comprised 4 dimensions (knowledge, movement, clinical reasoning, and virtues). Virtues implied respect for patients and a willingness of therapists to place the needs of patients above their own. Such attitudes are recognized as being integral to successful practice. The therapists in the present study thought that they were placing the needs of clients above their own by treating them while they were experiencing substantial levels of work-related pain. One could argue, however, that clients have the right to be treated by therapists who do not need to modify treatment, avoid certain activities, or worry about moving, lifting, or transferring clients safely because of work-related pain. Physical therapists and occupational therapists may be misinterpreting the very professional ideas that they are struggling to achieve. Placing the needs of clients first may mean they should not treat clients when their pain is so severe that it forces them to change the treatment plan. Future discussions of expert practice and professionalism should include more careful consideration of the health of physical therapists and occupational therapists and its relationship to quality of care.
Impact of Work-Related Pain on Work
The impact of work-related pain on work is not as easy to define. The participants made substantial changes in their work habits. They altered their schedules, avoided or adapted certain techniques, and factored their symptoms into clinical decision making. Other authors reported similar findings for physical therapists and occupational therapists.1,2,7
Despite these changes, decreased productivity did not emerge as a major theme. Few participants reported seeing fewer patients or working fewer hours. These findings were supported by the WOS of the SPS; work output remained fairly constant, with productivity at or above 90% for most participants. Physical therapy and occupational therapy are knowledge-based professions, but productivity may be viewed as the number of patients treated or as billable units completed. Our participants were able to make significant changes to compensate for their symptoms and to continue to see the same number of patients.
The work impairment measures, however, revealed substantial impairments. The participants in the present study had a mean WIS of 35.1%. Turpin et al17 studied people who had a variety of health conditions and who worked in both knowledge-based and production-based jobs. Their reported mean WISs for participants with arthritis and joint pain were 18.7% for knowledge-based jobs and 22.5% for production-based jobs. The mean WIS in the present study, therefore, was very high. According to Turpin et al,17 the WIS may provide a more precise indication of how health impairments affect work than the WOS. In the present study, the scores may have reflected effects on non–patient care activities. Therapists engage in non–patient care activities that may not be captured by measures of productivity.1,8,23 These include documentation, program development, quality initiatives, committee work, marketing, education, and professional development. We did not specifically discuss these activities during the focus group sessions and cannot know whether these activities are affected by work-related pain. However, the WIS may reflect such measures more completely than the WOS. The effects of pain on non–patient care activities require further exploration.
The effects of these changes on quality of patient care also are unclear. Although several therapists implied that patient care was compromised, most emphasized that they reflected on their modifications to be sure that they were treating patients appropriately. Although the therapists made changes to ease their symptoms, they were still experiencing moderate to severe pain at the time of the focus group sessions. The modifications that they made were not adequate to prevent exacerbation of their work-related pain.
The pervasive effects of work-related pain on activities outside of work affected therapists’ quality of life. Quality of life is characterized by an individual's perceptions of his or her function in the physical, psychological, and social domains of health.24 Moderate to severe pain and loss of vitality (eg, fatigue) are associated with decrements in overall health-related quality of life. Decreased health-related quality of life also has been associated with limited self-care ability and inability to perform activities associated with one's primary role, such as work, school, or home management.25 Like the participants in Alnaser's study of occupational therapists,26 the participants in the present study experienced work-related pain and fatigue that affected their interactions with friends and family, their leisure activities, their health management, and their ability to participate in social activities. Health-related quality of life in physical and occupational therapists with pain should be studied further with larger samples.
Most of the participants found their jobs to be rewarding and, in general, reported satisfaction with their career choices. These findings were consistent with the literature.27–29 Therapists value interactions with their patients and the caring nature of their professions.9,22,26 They promote client centeredness and client responsibility.9,30 Most participants in the present study reported that contact with patients and caring for others contributed to their job satisfaction, improved their mood and, in some cases, reduced their pain.
Alarmingly, however, most participants expressed doubt that they could continue in their professions over the long term, and many were considering alternative careers. Current demographic trends and current rates of education and retirement predict significant shortages of physical therapists and occupational therapists.11 Patients are older and heavier and often have more medically complex issues that will require the care of experienced therapists. Therefore, experienced occupational therapists and physical therapists who are able to remain in the professions for long career spans are needed.
Differences Between Occupational Therapists and Physical Therapists
The differences between occupational therapists and physical therapists require consideration. Physical therapy and occupational therapy have different professional orientations and goals. Research has indicated that occupational therapists and physical therapists have similar risks of injuries from similar types of activities.1 Despite these similarities, we examined the data for distinct and specific experiences of the 2 professions. Differences were difficult to detect, and the experiences of the participants appeared to be similar.
However, 2 phenomena that were specific to 1 discipline or the other did emerge. The occupational therapists in the present study cited pressure to prove themselves. They moved and transferred patients without asking for help because they felt pressure to demonstrate to other health care providers that they were just as capable of transferring patients as physical therapists. Another difference was the discussion of manual therapy by physical therapists. Manual therapy was cited by physical therapists as a source of pain, but it also was associated with a perception of higher quality of care. None of the occupational therapists in the present study worked in an outpatient, orthopedic setting, so there was no discussion of the role of manual therapy in their work.
Our findings do not suggest that the professions are similar or that the job tasks are always similar. What they do suggest is that the work of both professions is physically demanding and that physical therapists and occupational therapists work within similar professional cultures.
Limitations
The participants volunteered for the present study, so their experiences may have been more intense than those of typical therapists with work-related pain. They tended to have more body regions affected by work-related pain and substantially higher levels of severity of pain than are typical for therapists with pain.1,3 In addition, although the number of participants was large for a qualitative study, generalizability was necessarily limited. However, our findings can serve as an illustration of the range of effects that work-related pain may have on physical therapists and occupational therapists who continue to practice with pain.
One investigator knew 4 of the physical therapists professionally and 1 socially. This relationship may have affected their level of participation; analysis of the comments made by those participants revealed that they spoke more frequently and at greater length than other group members. The content of their discussions, however, did not differ from that of other participants.
Recommendations
Several additional studies are recommended. Larger, quantitative studies are needed to explore productivity, quality of care, quality of life, and career longevity in therapists with and without pain. Discussions about the relationship between professionalism and caring for patients while therapists are experiencing severe work-related pain also are recommended.
Workers in a broad range of other occupations and professions experience work-related pain each year.31 Given that more than 50% of physical and occupational therapists experience work-related pain each year,1,3 many therapists will continue to treat patients while experiencing some degree of pain without an undue impact on the intervention. When work-related pain reaches levels that affect clinical decision making or increase frustration with clients, however, professionalism could be compromised. Therapists and clients may be better served if the therapists take time off work and address their pain more formally. This scenario will require more attention to staffing levels.
Conclusions
Work-related pain affects occupational therapists and physical therapists at work and outside of work. The physical and psychosocial impacts of work-related pain and the physical nature of the work may limit clinical longevity. Large, national studies of work-related pain, the therapeutic activities associated with work-related pain, and the effects of work-related pain on work and nonwork activities are needed. In addition, the relationship between therapists’ adaptive behaviors and quality of care is worthy of further investigation. Aside from specific measures, a cultural shift in both professions is needed. Until the needs of therapists are considered in equal measure to the needs of patients, risky practices will continue and longevity may be compromised. The ability to practice over a long period of time without excessive effects on personal lives should be considered an important part of professionalism and expert practice.
Appendix 1.
Focus Group Questions
Appendix 2.
Emergent Themes
Footnotes
-
Both authors provided concept/idea/research design, writing, and data collection and analysis. Dr Campo provided project management, fund procurement, and facilities/equipment. The authors thank Paul Kochoa, PT, DPT, and Nitin Raju, PT, DPT, for their assistance with data entry, transcription, and focus group organization.
-
The study was approved by the institutional review boards of Mercy College and The Ohio State University.
-
This research was supported, in part, by a Mercy College Faculty Development Grant. No one involved with the grant review process had any involvement with the study or input into the way in which the study was designed or conducted.
-
Data from this study were presented at the Safe Patient Handling and Movement Conference; March 31–April 2, 2009; Orlando, Florida; and at the APTA Combined Sections Meeting; February 9–12, 2009; Las Vegas, Nevada.
-
↵* SPSS Inc, 233 S Wacker Dr, Chicago, IL 60606.
- Received March 19, 2009.
- Accepted January 24, 2010.
- © 2010 American Physical Therapy Association